[問題]GWD 23-Q1

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]GWD 23-Q1

文章bonus » 2007-01-06 11:31

Q1:
A major health insurance company in Lagolia pays for special procedures prescribed by physicians only if the procedure is first approved as 「medically necessary」 by a company-appointed review panel. The rule is intended to save the company the money it might otherwise spend on medically unnecessary procedures. The company has recently announced that in order to reduce its costs, it will abandon this rule.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest justification for the company’s decision?

A. Patients often register dissatisfaction with physicians who prescribe nothing for their ailments.
B. Physicians often prescribe special procedures that are helpful but not altogether necessary for the health of the patient.
C. The review process is expensive and practically always results in approval of the prescribed procedure.
D. The company’s review process does not interfere with the prerogative of physicians, in cases where more than one effective procedure is available, to select the one they personally prefer.
E. The number of members of the company-appointed review panel who review a given procedure depends on the cost of the procedure.

Answer: C
最後由 bonus 於 2007-01-09 11:04 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。
bonus
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 535
註冊時間: 2005-10-19 22:46

文章bonus » 2007-01-06 11:35

醫院為了省錢所以要取消這個制度,也就是說原來浪費錢或者不省錢。

rule是指公司安排專門的review panel來決定是否付款
C說review panel 本身就費錢,而且做出的判斷大都是通過(即有跟沒有是一樣的,肯定要取消)

答案C就是說這個制度又貴又對結果沒太多影響
bonus
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 535
註冊時間: 2005-10-19 22:46


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 8 位訪客