Q20:
Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted. The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling: despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily. This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.
In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim.
B. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
C. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
D. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.
E. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.
Answer: E
[問題]GWD 27-Q20
版主: shpassion, Traver0818
9 篇文章 • 第 1 頁 (共 1 頁)
由 raymangg » 2007-01-19 18:17
mimieye \$m[1]:我覺得不是這樣耶
這整段的結論並沒有否定第一個BF的論點,只有否定它的證據吧?!
所以我覺得第二個BF並沒有反駁第一個BF
E是說第二的BF試舉一個例子來支持原文的論點
D選項的第二句話好像是說第二個BF是用來證明他的例子有多不好
我還是覺得是E耶
請賜教!!
第一個BF跟第二個BF都是事實(fact) , 所以第二個BF沒有反駁第一個BF
(發生過的事實不能被weaken , 被weakn的應該是推論才對)
只是BF1跟BF2加在一起 , 原先的position就有問題了(引據失當)
因此BF2就成了reseaoning的support , 用來支持反駁critics的立場
所以答案是D
-
raymangg - 初級會員
- 文章: 72
- 註冊時間: 2005-12-28 15:17
由 A級垂耳兔 » 2007-01-25 17:41
BF題很少有題目讓我超過30秒幹掉....
玩一兩題給你看看你就知道了~~~
Q20:
Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted. The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling: despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily. This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.
In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim.
B. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
C. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
D. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.
E. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.
先看題目有沒有轉折詞..有!....however在中間...最典型的題目....前面句子當成負號後面句子當成正號....先看claimed that(表示一個推論)...馬上看答案...無法破解..轉彎看since(後面一定接原因...不會接結論或推論)....發現position還要provide support(藍色)...明顯不是講原因....刪...
在用正負符號判定...第一和第二句符號相反...答案A.E變成符號相同(綠色)...刪...
今天還有一題更快..只花10秒...找到在PO出來~~~
玩一兩題給你看看你就知道了~~~
Q20:
Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted. The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling: despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily. This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.
In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim.
B. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
C. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.
D. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.
E. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.
先看題目有沒有轉折詞..有!....however在中間...最典型的題目....前面句子當成負號後面句子當成正號....先看claimed that(表示一個推論)...馬上看答案...無法破解..轉彎看since(後面一定接原因...不會接結論或推論)....發現position還要provide support(藍色)...明顯不是講原因....刪...
在用正負符號判定...第一和第二句符號相反...答案A.E變成符號相同(綠色)...刪...
今天還有一題更快..只花10秒...找到在PO出來~~~
-
A級垂耳兔 - 高級會員
- 文章: 451
- 註冊時間: 2006-09-04 17:47
- 來自: 台北市
9 篇文章 • 第 1 頁 (共 1 頁)
誰在線上
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者：沒有註冊會員 和 3 位訪客
Copyright © 2006-2009 FormosaMBA.com. All Rights Reserved.
