[問題]GWD-7-Q32

[tobosu]

Q32:

A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.

A.claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought
B.claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought
C.claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
D.claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
E.claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts


答案(A)...其他的選項也不太好...但是...
1.(A)的 "MIGHT" 放在"SUGGEST" 後，是否省略較妥當..
2.(A)的 "as ~ as " 原級比較，遇到"否定"，不是應改成 " not so~as " 較佳...
卸卸...

[Pufa]

might要不要省略都可以，
not as..as也等同於not so..as。

其他錯都是因為主動詞不一致、as adj. as沒接名詞、囉唆。
A最好
claims suggest that the economy (might) not be as/so weak as (what) some analysts previously thought.

有錯請幫我指正

[agk99]

PUFA同學解的很好
小弟只有灌水的份

[ivanchiang]

might要不要省略都可以，
not as..as也等同於not so..as。

其他錯都是因為主動詞不一致、as adj. as沒接名詞、囉唆。
A最好
claims suggest that the economy (might) not be as/so weak as (what) some analysts previously thought.

有錯請幫我指正

請問as adj. as後面最好是接noun嗎??
那所以
C.claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
D.claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
E.claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts
姑且不論其他的錯誤，這都是不好的文法結構嗎?

[Behemoth]

不一定要接名詞啊
c跟e的寫法是as當關代使用
只不過被動囉唆了點

[ivanchiang]

喔~~~暸!

[ivanchiang]

喔~~~了解!
哀...我以為我又發現新大陸了...

[lunar916]

C.claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
除了囉唆外有錯誤嗎?

A.claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought
是否有可能造成economy跟some analysts比較的混淆??

[林小馬]

C.claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
除了囉唆外有錯誤嗎?

A.claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought
是否有可能造成economy跟some analysts比較的混淆??

A我個人覺得大概是不會有混淆的問題
因為as有一個功能好像是像which一樣的關代,
只是加有比較起來相等的意味
所以可以想成the economy which some analysts previously thought....
(我好像講得有點不清楚,有人可以幫忙一下嗎)

C的話
有幾個想法,不確定正確喔,可是你可以參考看看
1)我覺得時態有沒有可能有點問題,
previously是不是不是很適合用完成式
聽起來就很像是過去的事情
2)就算時態OK的話也不該用have been因為他用被動所以have的主詞是economy,動詞就應該用has been
3)還有我覺得這邊被動沒有主動好
如果說the economy was thought to be weak我覺得OK
但如果說the economy was thought by some analysts to be weak.
就不順,不如把some analysts提到前面當主詞

[suechi915]

這一題我有些想法想跟大家分享與討論

1. 有關於as adj as
我覺得這裡不可以用not be so weak as 要用not be as weak as
因為weak是[nagative]
not be so adj as 用於表達沒有這麼[好]以至於...

而第二個as可用於當關代或連接詞

2. 同意林小馬大大講的時態以及被動語態少用

[Lory]

這一題我有些想法想跟大家分享與討論

1. 有關於as adj as
我覺得這裡不可以用not be so weak as 要用not be as weak as
因為weak是[nagative]
not be so adj as 用於表達沒有這麼[好]以至於...

而第二個as可用於當關代或連接詞

2. 同意林小馬大大講的時態以及被動語態少用

是滴!!!!

[EmmaCYC]

請問為什麼B不行
so...as 不就是用在否定嗎?
時態have+PP我覺得很合理阿
因為分析師到claim之前到這個時點都是這樣認為是weak的

請問我的想法是不是有什麼問題
謝謝

[吳]

請問為什麼B不行
so...as 不就是用在否定嗎?
時態have+PP我覺得很合理阿
因為分析師到claim之前到這個時點都是這樣認為是weak的

請問我的想法是不是有什麼問題
謝謝

B.claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought

S.V.不一致

[EmmaCYC]

突然覺得自己問了一個很白痴的問題...
謝謝

[lynn720908]

下個結論
A. 正確
B.clains suggests (主動詞不一致)
C.被動語態, the economy 和 have been 不一致
D.被動式不佳
E.被動式不佳