Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]大全987-199

[問題]大全987-199

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]大全987-199

文章cafe » 2005-03-31 10:21

199.Car owners who inflate their tires properly can substantially boost their vehicles’ fuel efficiency, since the increase in car-road friction can waste up to five percent of car fuel by underinflation.
(A) Car owners who inflate their tires properly can substantially boost their vehicles’ fuel efficiency, since the increase in car-road friction can waste up to five percent of car fuel by underinflation.
(B) Because the underinflation of tires can waste up to five percent of a car’s fuel by increasing car-road friction, car owners can substantially boost their vehicles’ fuel efficiency by properly inflating the tires.
(C) Their vehicles’ fuel efficiency is substantially boosted by car owners through the proper inflation of tires that, when underinflated, can waste up to five percent of car fuel by an increase in car-road friction.
(D) The proper inflation of tires by car owners, due to the fact that underinflation can waste up to five percent of a car’s fuel by the increase of car-road friction, can substantially boost their fuel efficiency.
(E) Because up to five percent of a car’s fuel are wasted through the increases in car-road friction when the tires are underinflated, car owners properly inflating tires can substantially boost their fuel efficiency.

Key: B, why?
如果看英文跟看中文一樣簡單就好了
頭像
cafe
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 28
註冊時間: 2005-01-10 00:21

文章Calvin » 2005-03-31 11:11

why not B ?

what is your answer ?

can u tell us your thoughts more ?
有一些無聲的話語,只有尋夢的人,彼此才聽得懂
頭像
Calvin
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1155
註冊時間: 2004-12-28 02:46

文章lioyd » 2006-03-18 17:30

可以請教一下A為何錯嗎?
是因為第一個their的原因嗎?their應該是指代 Car owners',若是這樣car owner's tires也沒什麼不對吧??^^" 謝謝指教囉
lioyd
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 43
註冊時間: 2006-01-13 22:12

文章hsudk » 2006-03-21 09:07

(A)和(B)的差別是在句意,(A)的最後一句話不合理,increase 不會藉由 underinflation 去 waste up。

另外一個差別在於(A)用了of car fuel,顯然沒有 of a car's fuel 來得好。
For PhD Applicants: http://phdent.blogspot.com/
hsudk
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 196
註冊時間: 2005-11-04 15:03

文章lioyd » 2006-03-21 10:20

Thx~~~十分清楚的解釋,謝囉^^
lioyd
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 43
註冊時間: 2006-01-13 22:12

文章dibert8 » 2007-03-28 00:33

我想 (A) 不好在於 since 後面解釋時沒有針對前面提過的重點 "inflate tires", "fuel efficiency", 主詞一開頭就提 friction, 跟前面接不上.
(C) fuel efficiency can waste ... => 不合邏輯
(D) their 應該單數 (=inflation), 句意也奇怪, inflation 有什麼 fuel efficiency 可言? => 不選
(E) 被動少選; fuel 不可數吧!
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 5 位訪客