Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD 18-18

GWD 18-18

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD 18-18

文章Jackson0317 » 2005-11-18 14:51

The first shots of the American Revolution, fired at Lexington and Concord. Massachusetts, were, according to legend, heard around the world, but news of these shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another additional eleven days to reach Charleston, South Carolina.

A. shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another additional eleven days
B. shots that was sent by swift messenger took four days in order to reach New York City, and also another eleven days
C. shots that were sent by swift messenger took four days to reach New York City and another eleven days
D. shots took four days by swift messenger in order to reach New York City and another eleven days in addition
E. shots took four days by swift messenger to reach New York City and another eleven days

Ans: E

想做個確認,最後我是選擇 C和E. C和E的別是一個是Messager take four days to reach和另一個是Shots take four days to reach. 以句意好像E比較make sense. However,原句是messenger, 這樣選E有沒有改變原本句意之嫌. 請參考
Jackson0317
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 35
註冊時間: 2005-06-27 09:12
來自: Taiwan

文章維尼 » 2005-11-18 18:16

C有另一個問題 that were ... 變成 shots were sent
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

文章Jackson0317 » 2005-11-18 20:47

不好意思,部是很懂您的意思.

That代shots文法上是ok的吧
Jackson0317
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 35
註冊時間: 2005-06-27 09:12
來自: Taiwan

文章meefoo » 2005-11-20 23:06

C.
news of these shots that were sent by swift messenger took four days to reach New York City and another eleven days

E.
news of these shots took four days by swift messenger to reach New York City and another eleven days

我覺得C和E的took都不會改變句意,因為他們的主詞都是news

但我有問題的是,C的 'that were sent by swift messenger' 不是比E的 'by swift messenger' 更清楚形容是swift messenger來send這些news嗎?
還是應該想E比C簡潔,所以選E?

麻煩大大幫忙解釋一下E的句型喔~
meefoo
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 49
註冊時間: 2005-09-29 16:15

文章Steve Hsieh » 2005-11-22 15:35

(C)shots (that sent by swift messenger ) adj cl 修飾 shots 修飾誤置
(E)news (of these shots) took four days by swift messenger to...
sub. verb
news took four days 經快遞送至....
so, (c) and (A)(B) modify error
Steve Hsieh
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 34
註冊時間: 2005-11-22 14:06

文章pamelatsai » 2005-11-25 10:55

(C)是N1介N2 that的形式~that也是可以修飾news
如果考慮簡潔似乎是(E)比較好
可是我覺得(C)的句意比較清楚耶~~

還請大大指教
頭像
pamelatsai
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 98
註冊時間: 2005-11-04 17:39

文章維尼 » 2005-11-28 16:31

首先
要知道 news 是 不可數名詞
that were ... 的複數動詞使得that子句變成是去修飾 shots 而不是 news
所以C的句意就錯了
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

文章jim9619 » 2005-12-06 10:19

維尼 \$m[1]:首先
要知道 news 是 不可數名詞
that were ... 的複數動詞使得that子句變成是去修飾 shots 而不是 news
所以C的句意就錯了


老大你真行.....
連這都注意到了
厲害厲害!!
jim9619
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 71
註冊時間: 2005-06-23 23:28

文章csc » 2005-12-11 13:17

維尼 \$m[1]:首先
要知道 news 是 不可數名詞
that were ... 的複數動詞使得that子句變成是去修飾 shots 而不是 news
所以C的句意就錯了


細心果然是應考的第一調考試規則
頭像
csc
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 859
註冊時間: 2005-11-04 23:27
來自: 桃園

文章hyte » 2005-12-17 20:09

可我有個問題耶
我記得og10有一題講到戴奧辛
照理說戴奧辛是不可數的(莫北北說的)
但og卻應是給它加s~那題的考點在many跟much
我記得當下我馬上刪掉"戴奧辛加s"的配many的選項
但結果卻錯了

所以我在想是不是不太能用自己的主觀認定去判斷呀?
雖然我也同意news不可數!
^^"

還有呀~我自己覺得shots took four days "by swift messenger"很怪
by多半用在被動句型或是表方法手段
在這裡既不是被動也不是方法手段
好怪喔~
個人淺見
我是選c
但那news也頗有爭議^^"
hyte
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 44
註冊時間: 2005-10-14 00:18

文章Emilyh » 2007-04-08 14:30

A. shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another additional eleven days

請問which是修飾shots還是news,如果是修飾shot,會改變句意嗎?

謝謝
Emilyh
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 51
註冊時間: 2005-09-16 14:31
來自: Taipei

文章keane0727 » 2007-04-10 02:11

Emilyh \$m[1]:A. shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another additional eleven days

請問which是修飾shots還是news,如果是修飾shot,會改變句意嗎?

謝謝

信差只能送news不會送shots
shots, which were sent by這裡which只能指代shots,因為news是不可數名詞要配單數動詞,所以A選項不合邏輯
keane0727
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 134
註冊時間: 2006-05-24 16:57

文章Emilyh » 2007-04-10 22:14

謝謝!!
Emilyh
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 51
註冊時間: 2005-09-16 14:31
來自: Taipei

文章pimi » 2007-11-12 23:54

前面有大大說到B是modify error
請問B是如何的modify error????
pimi
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 388
註冊時間: 2005-01-21 14:50

文章dibert8 » 2007-11-13 11:53

news {of these shots} that was sent by...
that = news 修飾應該沒有問題.
(B) in order to 不簡潔; and 前面不要逗點(改變句意)
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

下一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客