Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - [問題]OG-78

[問題]OG-78

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG-78

帖子DARY » 2005-03-16 20:40

OG-78
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assingned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the condition above?

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.
(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.
(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that colsely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.
(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.


Ans:(E)

呼!真是太神奇了..白天一直看不懂的,剛剛一打完,題目看懂了,答案也選出來了 :laugh
證明了頭昏腦脹的時候不適宜再繼續念AT :PP

費了一番功夫打了,就再問清楚一點好了..題目第一句話的was read為什麼要用被動啊??(好像在問SC一樣 :PP )
头像
DARY
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 108
注册: 2004-11-30 17:22

帖子Pudding » 2005-03-16 21:02

呵呵.... gmat 就是這樣的, 有時候念的累了, 實在搞不懂了, 記得放鬆一下再回頭看ㄛ...

"was read": 小朋友是聽故事的... 至於講故事的人, 也許是幼稚園老師, 也許是試驗研究人員, 因為不重要, 所以用被動啦....
"為此我更加堅信, 這個世界上的人是會分'掛'的. 假如你發現自己跟某種族群成為'一掛', 你會驚訝自己的生活細節中, 原來跟他們有那麼多的相像; 而隨著廝混的日子增長, 你們對人生的品味大約也就會越來越接近. 透過這樣的接近, 差不多也就能分享一生了吧."
头像
Pudding
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
帖子: 762
注册: 2004-12-02 09:42

帖子gogotu » 2005-05-10 17:45

呵呵…自己打字喔?讚!
可是這題答案好像是A說…
gogotu
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 50
注册: 2005-03-31 15:02

帖子JS » 2005-05-10 18:40

My answer is A although E is not bad either.

In the argument, the conclusion is drew that Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.
and answer A tell us that in those stories the "intention" is too difficult for those kids to understand. That explains why the young kids didnt vary the punishment. If the kids can tell "intention" as they did on telling the "serverity" at Answer E, these young kinds will most likely vary the punishment. also "do not understand" refute "do not regard".

Answer E -The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories. serverity doesnt equal "intention"
.

Did not realise that this question is from OG. I check the answer from the book and yes, the answer is A
JS
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 81
注册: 2005-04-07 16:39
地址: London

帖子briandragon » 2005-08-22 11:13

請高手~解釋一下
題目的意思

我看不大懂

謝謝
briandragon
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 43
注册: 2005-03-22 21:59

帖子evelight » 2005-08-22 23:50

請問是哪句看不懂呢?

如果是整個題目看不懂
那麼我想您的問題不在於CR,而是RC
建議先加強文法觀念和RC
再回頭看CR就會順利的多
畢竟CR是小閱讀
先看懂題目才有辦法進入邏輯的層面
Crystal Wu
Georgetown MBA of 2008
头像
evelight
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 421
注册: 2005-01-01 04:16

帖子shine_allen » 2005-10-13 00:13

A答案說:
在解釋stories時,聽的人必須用相對較成熟的心理來判斷
故事中harm是故意的還是不小心的,暗示小孩子沒有成熟的
心理怎麼可能判斷是有意的還是無意的
,因此weaken the conclusion presented above.
头像
shine_allen
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 367
注册: 2005-09-12 02:40

帖子小笨笨 » 2006-08-15 23:12

我知道shine_allen的意思,可是怎麼一點都體會不出來是如此"暗示小孩子沒有成熟的心理怎麼可能判斷是有意的還是無意的" 而且og的A項解說我也無法了解,所以我作題時也選 E吔!
還有更清楚的解說嗎?
GO!GO!GO!go to usa
小笨笨
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 59
注册: 2005-10-11 23:30

帖子hccill » 2006-08-25 19:17

題目是要weaken conclusion,而conclusion是說小孩子(younger)不認為處罰和意圖之間有任何關係

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
=>A是說,在聽故事時,小孩子要有成熟的心態,才能分辨是有意還是無心,而小孩子(younger)之所以認為處罰和意圖之間沒有任何關係,並不是因為真的沒關係,而是因為小孩子(younger)根本沒有成熟的心態去判斷是否是有意還是無心
=>weaken

(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.
=>E是說,說小孩子能夠根據不同的嚴重程度的harm,來給予不同程度的逞罰,即小孩子的新制程度是夠成熟的,所以今天小孩子(younger)認為處罰和意圖之間沒有任何關係,就是沒有任何關係
=>support

open to discuss~
工作是這樣子低: 做事一半, 做人一半!
hccill
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 174
注册: 2005-12-22 14:43
地址: 阿波星球

Re: [問題]OG-78

帖子puresillylily » 2006-08-31 07:02

DARY \$m[1]:OG-78
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assingned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the condition above?

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.
(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.
(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that colsely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.
(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.


Ans:(E) ---> NO. OG Answer: A.

呼!真是太神奇了..白天一直看不懂的,剛剛一打完,題目看懂了,答案也選出來了 :laugh
證明了頭昏腦脹的時候不適宜再繼續念AT :PP

費了一番功夫打了,就再問清楚一點好了..題目第一句話的was read為什麼要用被動啊??(好像在問SC一樣 :PP )
puresillylily
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 25
注册: 2006-07-08 17:35

帖子dibert8 » 2007-04-10 14:15

"was read stories " 大人唸故事給小孩聽吧!
(A) 最直接有力的弱化: the listeners had ...to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally. 聽完故事,小朋友已能分辨蓄意還是無心
(B) (E) severity <> intention
(C) (D) 不是問這個
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17

OG 78

帖子CherrieLi » 2007-10-29 23:50

為什麼我再怎麼看都是覺得(A)是support, (E) 才是 weaken ??

(A) 因為沒有成熟的心智, 所以還沒有辦法分辨 ---> support

(E) 小孩子其實是有能力分辨的, 所以依照不同傷害程度給予不同處罰 ---> weaken

還請幫忙提供詳細解釋
CherrieLi
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 125
注册: 2007-06-14 21:37

帖子dibert8 » 2007-10-30 09:52

可能多想了:題目沒有討論小孩心智的觀點.
重點是 intention 不是 severity. (E) 是開放式的敘述,應該避免自己給結論.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 5 位游客