53. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court rules that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
(E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
正確答案是(A)
這一題老師有講過...可是現在再回來看的時候,又覺得怪怪的了
原則上 (C) (D) (E) 刪去沒有問題,問題是在(A)與(B):
如果說 (B) 是錯的 ==> because of their unlawful seizure of
中的 their 會有ambiguity的情形,那麼
(A)中的 for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands...
這個 their 又為甚麼沒有ambiguity的情形呢?
老師有說過 我也有聽 ==> 代名詞95%代替原題主詞 那麼 (A)跟(B)的 their
應該都代替 two upstate New York counties 啊! 而不是印地安人..
請各位高手指教!!! 謝謝!!