OG11th Q28

[oguz]

State spokesperson: Many business who have not been to our state believe that we have an inadequate road system. Those people are mistaken, as is obvious from the fact that in each of the past six years, our state has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the spokeperson's argument?

(A) In the spokesperson's state, spending on road improvements has been increasing more slowly over the past six years than it has in several other states.
(B) Adequency of a state's road system is generally less important to a businessperson considering doing business there than is the availability of qualified employees.
(C) Over the past six years, numerous businesses have left the spokesperson's state, but about as many businesses have moved into the state.
(D) In general, the number of miles of road in a state's road system depends in both the area and the population of the state.
(E) Only states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts of money on road improvements.

答案是(E)
我當初的答案是(B), 因為我想說商人不來這一州貿易不是因為交通不便的因素, 而是在那一州根本找不到人才
請問這樣的推理哪裡錯了呢?

[jungtsu]

根據我的答題經驗，CR題目常常會有一個小前題才做推論，而需要我們去做的部分主要是針對推論去做。(因為前提只是會了引出推論)

如這題 Many business who have not been to our state believe that we have an inadequate road system. 是一個前提

真正要回答的是道路系統夠不夠的問題

這樣講不知道通不通，但是因為我做幾題大致是這樣
所以就提出來
大家可以討論看看

[dibert8]

此題同OG10-Q201
重點在反駁州發言人不承認該州是 inadequate road system
所以選項指出該州是 inadequate road system 便直接擊中要害 => (E)