[求助]GWD 18-28

[shirley720622]

Q28:
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

答案D，我選A
A說很多人到中途就取回一些投資在特別帳戶裡的錢了
那不是就waken結論說政府的計畫成功嗎?
D說很多人從長期戶頭轉錢到特別帳戶裡
那不是反而support政府計畫成功嗎?

請指教，謝謝．

[dibert8]

為鼓勵儲蓄,政府提供的特殊帳戶累積很多錢,所以政府說計畫成功.
(A) 特殊帳戶存款被提領,無礙"特殊帳戶累積很多錢",因為弱化不能去否定題目.
(D) 老百姓把錢從左口袋 (long-term savings) 轉到右口袋 (special savings) ,實際上儲蓄沒有增加,就不能說計畫成功囉!