15. (25986-!-item-!-188;#058&002914)
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.
(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.
(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.
Ans: (B)
I choose (D)
題幹: 效價競爭是無法獲利的 即使可以搶回顧客 一旦之後想收回損失把低價的商品價格調高回來只是給對手機會進行更激進的削價競爭 找weaken
(A)低於成本求售而爭奪客源的合法性無關
(C)銷售策略是以低於成本價求售 重複題意
(E)價價求售會使顧客增加 無關 重複題意
我選D 公司資源配置已轉在其他路線 因此對手進行更激烈削價手段時不會影響原公司的獲利
不懂為什麼(B)是答案 (B)是說公司的執行長本來就預測到對手會進行更激烈的削價競爭嗎?