PP2 CR # 110

[autumn713]

110. Ounce for ounce, blends of different artificial sweeteners match any individual artificial sweetener in sweetening power. When used to sweeten food, blends greatly decrease the likelihood that consumers will exceed acceptable daily intakes for individual sweetener. Blends should therefore be used, rather than single sweeteners alone, since blends are clearly more healthful, yet equally effective.
The argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) When ingested together, different artificial sweeteners in the blends do not interact in a way that makes them harmful to human health.
(B) Different artificial sweeteners, when used together in food, do not contribute a more desirable flavor to the food than would any one of them by itself.
(C) The acceptable daily intake for any given artificial sweetener is a conservative figure that could probably be greatly exceeded at little or no risk.
(D) Consumers who substitute artificial sweeteners for sugar in their diets generally keep track of their daily intake of different sweeteners.
(E) The ill effects on health produced by the intake of excessive quantities of any single artificial sweetener cannot be reversed by reducing intake later

ANS: A.
但是我的問題是:
When used to sweeten food, blends greatly decrease the likelihood that consumers will exceed acceptable daily intakes for individual sweetener. Blends should therefore be used, rather than single sweeteners alone, since blends are clearly more healthful, yet equally effective. 因為有therefore, 所以我覺的這兩句合起來　才是結論　
所以"Blends減低攝取過量的機會 所以應該用它 因為它較健康"
那假攝為啥不是　ｅ？？
如果攝取過多可以被reverse, 那blends就不會比教健康了-->反駁的反駁

Thanks.

[autumn713]

110. Ounce for ounce, blends of different artificial sweeteners match any individual artificial sweetener in sweetening power. When used to sweeten food, blends greatly decrease the likelihood that consumers will exceed acceptable daily intakes for individual sweetener. Blends should therefore be used, rather than single sweeteners alone, since blends are clearly more healthful, yet equally effective.
The argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) When ingested together, different artificial sweeteners in the blends do not interact in a way that makes them harmful to human health.
(B) Different artificial sweeteners, when used together in food, do not contribute a more desirable flavor to the food than would any one of them by itself.
(C) The acceptable daily intake for any given artificial sweetener is a conservative figure that could probably be greatly exceeded at little or no risk.
(D) Consumers who substitute artificial sweeteners for sugar in their diets generally keep track of their daily intake of different sweeteners.
(E) The ill effects on health produced by the intake of excessive quantities of any single artificial sweetener cannot be reversed by reducing intake later

ANS: A.
但是我的問題是:
When used to sweeten food, blends greatly decrease the likelihood that consumers will exceed acceptable daily intakes for individual sweetener. Blends should therefore be used, rather than single sweeteners alone, since blends are clearly more healthful, yet equally effective. 因為有therefore, 所以我覺的這兩句合起來　才是結論　
所以"Blends減低攝取過量的機會 所以應該用它 因為它較健康"
那假攝為啥不是　ｅ？？
如果攝取過多可以被reverse, 那blends就不會比教健康了-->反駁的反駁

Thanks.

又看了一次
我發現應該是Blends有好處1. 同效力 2. 減低攝取過量的機會 所以應該用它 因為它較健康　所以劃線處為結論沒錯　是我耍笨....><

sorry...

[dibert8]

(A) 取非,則命題不成立; OK.
(B) 無關於 flavor
(C) 無關於 conservative figure
(D) 無關於 sugar
(E) 無關於 ill effects