Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD4-Q13

GWD4-Q13

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD4-Q13

文章himorgan » 2005-04-02 19:31

A leading figures in the Scottish enlightment, Adam Smith's two major books are to democratic capitalism what Marx's Das Kapital is to socialism.

A.Adam Smith's two major books are to democratic capitalism what
B.Adam Smith's two books are to democratic capitalism like
C.Adam Smith's two books are to democratic capitalism just as
D.Adam Smith wrote two major books that are to democratic capitalism similar to
E.Adam Smith wrote two books thatare to democratic capitalism what

這題用刪去法可以求得答案是(E)
但是可以請人幫我解釋一下這邊的what嗎
himorgan
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 63
註冊時間: 2005-01-18 00:16

Re: GWD4-Q13

文章hsiaoj » 2005-04-03 00:25

himorgan \$m[1]:A leading figures in the Scottish enlightment, Adam Smith's two major books are to democratic capitalism what Marx's Das Kapital is to socialism.

A.Adam Smith's two major books are to democratic capitalism what
B.Adam Smith's two books are to democratic capitalism like
C.Adam Smith's two books are to democratic capitalism just as
D.Adam Smith wrote two major books that are to democratic capitalism similar to
E.Adam Smith wrote two books thatare to democratic capitalism what

這題用刪去法可以求得答案是(E)
但是可以請人幫我解釋一下這邊的what嗎


A is to B what C is to D 是慣用法阿
剛好看到手邊的note 就獻醜一下 :laugh

A is to B what C is to D
= A is to B as C is to D
=As C is to D so is A to B
=What C is to D that is A to B
頭像
hsiaoj
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 60
註冊時間: 2005-01-30 00:42

文章Behemoth » 2005-04-16 23:37

就正確答案e來說
a leading figure 是 Adam Smith 的同位語
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

文章hungji » 2005-07-05 21:42

1.比較答案差異
2.差異(1)Adam Smith's與Adam Smith (2)what與like與just as與similar to
3.回原題 a leading "figure" 刪 ABC
4. A be to B what C be to D, 選 E, E 對了
快速作答 提升對率 繼續下一題
頭像
hungji
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 291
註冊時間: 2005-06-24 14:06

文章Tiva » 2005-08-21 17:48

請問一下在A be to B what C be to D的結構中是否不一定要平衡啊?
因為E選項中的前半是子句主詞為人(Adam Smith)而that are to ~~修飾books
後半的主詞是書(Marx's Das Kapital)
看起來怪怪的耶.... *-)
Tiva
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 7
註冊時間: 2005-05-03 17:28

文章FionaV » 2005-09-28 05:42

雖然寫對了 但我只是納悶 為什麼 "similar to"不行呢?
FionaV
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 71
註冊時間: 2005-09-16 03:40

文章Miranda's » 2005-11-27 14:38

Tiva \$m[1]:請問一下在A be to B what C be to D的結構中是否不一定要平衡啊?
因為E選項中的前半是子句主詞為人(Adam Smith)而that are to ~~修飾books
後半的主詞是書(Marx's Das Kapital)
看起來怪怪的耶.... *-)

前半句的主詞應該是 two major books that are... 對應 Marx's Das Kapital is to.....
如有錯誤請指教喲^^
頭像
Miranda's
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 49
註冊時間: 2005-10-07 20:13

文章Miranda's » 2005-11-30 16:02

請問如果選項(C) "Adam Smith's two major books" are to democratic capitalism just as

Adam Smith's two major books 改成
Adam Smith wrote two major books that
那麼 just as就可以了嗎? just as是conj. 那是不是用法同as 呢?
如果不是那該為什麼用法??? 謝謝賜教^^
頭像
Miranda's
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 49
註冊時間: 2005-10-07 20:13

文章dreammyevian » 2006-10-27 06:59

各位大大 對不起喔 我還是不懂為什麼不能用 SIMILAR TO
dreammyevian
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 2
註冊時間: 2006-07-16 23:32

文章poo » 2006-11-03 00:11

我也不懂
請問是因為要用慣用語所以不用similar to 嗎
poo
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 50
註冊時間: 2006-02-17 14:52

文章allka » 2007-08-19 12:33

similar to + N
allka
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 4
註冊時間: 2007-03-08 11:10

文章bmwmthree » 2008-07-22 17:44

be smiliar to
(D) be to smiliar to >>>>前面多一個to 無此用法
bmwmthree
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 24
註冊時間: 2006-03-19 15:28


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 5 位訪客