Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - [問題]OG 41

[問題]OG 41

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG 41

帖子Megan Lin » 2006-03-03 15:28

41. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a conven¬tion for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legisla¬tures of two-thirds of the states.
(A)was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B)was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consider¬ation of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C)was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D)has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E)has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amend¬ments to the document when formally asked to do so

答案是E
這裡的問題是,除了CD 是因為fragment,ABE 我該如何分析呢?
我有點無法判斷OG說的 The predicate "has never been applied" refers to a span of time,from the writing of the Constitution to the present, rather than to a past event(as was does).

麻煩大家了
謝謝
头像
Megan Lin
新手會員
新手會員
 
帖子: 19
注册: 2005-05-14 01:21

帖子hsudk » 2006-03-03 19:04

(E)選項打錯了吧?applied 後面應該是逗號不是句號吧?

it 不可以指代前面整個句子,要指代整個句子必須用 so,故 (A)(B)(C)錯。
For PhD Applicants: http://phdent.blogspot.com/
hsudk
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 196
注册: 2005-11-04 15:03

Re: [問題]OG 41

帖子scujean » 2006-03-06 17:17

Megan Lin \$m[1]:41 Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legisla¬tures of two-thirds of the states.
(A)was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B)was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consider¬ation of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C)was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D)has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E)has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amend¬ments to the document when formally asked to do so

答案是E
這裡的問題是,除了CD 是因為fragment,ABE 我該如何分析呢?
我有點無法判斷OG說的 The predicate "has never been applied" refers to a span of time,from the writing of the Constitution to the present, rather than to a past event(as was does).←現在完成式的用法是用來表示一各動作從過去開始,維持到現在。而過去式的用法是,表示過去某一時點的動作。


題目簡譯:在從來沒被應用到憲法法規,國會需要昭集會議去考慮(對該法規)可能的改變。

而這句[highlight=yellow]Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied.[/highlight]
的意思是,[highlight=yellow]過去沒沒應用到的憲法法規[/highlight],有給人憲法法規只在過去存在的意思,而憲法到現在都還在用
头像
scujean
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 317
注册: 2005-11-10 16:44
地址: blue planet

帖子afra_hung » 2006-11-26 22:31

簡易判斷...never通常會跟現在完成式合用...
表示從以前到現在為止從未如何如何....
afra_hung
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 48
注册: 2005-08-21 22:29

帖子pimi » 2007-08-22 00:25

想請問whereby為何會造成句子fragment??
whereby的詞性為何呢??
是連接詞還是其他詞性呢??
pimi
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 388
注册: 2005-01-21 14:50

帖子lucyyeh » 2007-08-22 14:38

whereby 是副詞
- by means of which or according to which

我的想法是Congress 已經Under...就不用whereby了
lucyyeh
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 410
注册: 2007-03-22 12:20

帖子dibert8 » 2007-08-25 12:51

whereby = by which (關係副詞)
所以 (D) 1. 句子沒有動詞, 2. which 指啥? (i.e. whereby 修飾什麼?)
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17

帖子alisonc » 2007-08-28 00:15

可以了解by which的which無所指
但是1)句中沒有動詞 不是很能理解
不能說是Congress is required to call~ by.....嗎?

謝謝
alisonc
新手會員
新手會員
 
帖子: 18
注册: 2007-05-23 02:32

帖子dibert8 » 2007-08-28 07:00

whereby 是關代,沒看到主要子句.
i.e. 'Under a provision..., whereby...' 不是句子.

OG 的解釋:
By introducing the subordinating conjunction whereby, C and D produce sentence fragments.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17

帖子nemolee » 2008-03-26 01:35

不好意思,想借問一下,於於OG 上說的:
Finally, the pronoun it ungrammatically refers back to the entire expression regarding {what Congress is required to do and should be replaced by to do so}, which more clearly and correctly refers to what Congress must do.
他說 it 指代不能代全部,這個我可以了解,可是後來又說 Congress is required to do and should be replaced by to do so , 這地方不是很了解,為什麼一定要用 to do so ? to do so 放在在題目的中文表示是????

謝謝
nemolee
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 154
注册: 2007-12-10 10:38

帖子dibert8 » 2008-03-26 06:52

so 指前面提過的事情.

from Merriam-Webster,
so [adverb]: in a manner or way indicated or suggested <do you really think so> —often used as a substitute for a preceding clause <are you ready? I think so><I didn't like it and I told her so>
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 5 位游客