Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - OG(11TH)Diagnostic Test Verbal 50

OG(11TH)Diagnostic Test Verbal 50

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

OG(11TH)Diagnostic Test Verbal 50

文章airdog » 2007-08-30 10:03

By developing the Secure Digital Music Initiative, the recording industory associations of North America, Japan, and Europe hope to createa standardized way of distributing songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet that will protect copyright holders and foil the many audio pirates who copy and distribute digital music illegally.
(A)of distributing songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet that will protect copyright holders and foil the many audio pirates who copy and distribute
(B)of distributing songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet and to protect copyright holders and foiling the many audio pirates copying and distributing
(C)for distributing songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet while it protects copyright holders and foils the many audio pirates who copy and distribute
(D)to distribute songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet while they will protect copyright holders and foil the many audio pirates copying and distributing
(E)to distribute songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet and it will protect copyright holders and foiling the many audio pirates who copy and distribute

答案選A

兩個問題

1.A中的that擺在on the Internet後方是否會造成修飾對象的錯誤?
2.將句尾後方的who刪除並把後方兩E個V改為Ving是否有誤?
成功
不該是只有讓自己功成名就

而是
想讓周遭的人以你為榮
頭像
airdog
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 29
註冊時間: 2007-04-24 20:46

文章dibert8 » 2007-09-01 11:57

that (= way) 修飾 of 前面的名詞並沒有問題(只要 of 後面那一串都在修飾 way). 這種時候是句意取勝: that 不是在說明 internet

who copy and distribute 改成 copying and distributing 會造成修飾歧異,因為 who = pirates 很明確,但是 copying and distributing 可能會修飾到 holders, 句意就不對了.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章kigosam » 2007-09-20 15:52

dibert8 \$m[1]:that (= way) 修飾 of 前面的名詞並沒有問題(只要 of 後面那一串都在修飾 way). 這種時候是句意取勝: that 不是在說明 internet

who copy and distribute 改成 copying and distributing 會造成修飾歧異,因為 who = pirates 很明確,但是 copying and distributing 可能會修飾到 holders, 句意就不對了.



請問喔
(A)of distributing songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet that will protect copyright holders and foil the many audio pirates who copy and distribute
上面不是已經有 and 斷開了嗎?如果改成 copying and distributing 應該不會修飾到holders 吧?句意上應該還沒有關系吧?因為他們現在還是一直在做這件事情。

另外想請教一下在og 11 th上面的解釋
(c) Way for should instead be way of; the pronoun reference in while it protects is ambiguous; construction suggests that protection comes from something other than the standardized way


這裡面的it他說會有ambiguous ,可是這邊代起來的話不就是 a srandardized way 嗎?
頭像
kigosam
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 33
註冊時間: 2005-06-09 00:31

回覆

文章hey » 2007-09-20 22:18

其實(E)選項後面並不平衡, 如果你仔細看的話, 你會發覺it will protect copyright holders and foiling the many....., 其用and連接, 為什麼前面後面會變成foiling呢??? 所以不選(E)

還有你怎麼會知道it代的是 a standardized way呢??? 它也可能代Japan, Internet等, 所以選項裡如果有it的話則會有ambiguity產生
hey
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 119
註冊時間: 2005-03-31 10:59

文章dibert8 » 2007-09-22 10:04

kigosam \$m[1]:
dibert8 \$m[1]:who copy and distribute 改成 copying and distributing 會造成修飾歧異,因為 who = pirates 很明確,但是 copying and distributing 可能會修飾到 holders, 句意就不對了.



請問喔
(A)of distributing songs and fulllength recordings on the Internet that will protect copyright holders and foil the many audio pirates who copy and distribute
上面不是已經有 and 斷開了嗎?如果改成 copying and distributing 應該不會修飾到holders 吧?句意上應該還沒有關系吧?因為他們現在還是一直在做這件事情。

另外想請教一下在og 11 th上面的解釋
(c) Way for should instead be way of; the pronoun reference in while it protects is ambiguous; construction suggests that protection comes from something other than the standardized way


這裡面的it他說會有ambiguous ,可是這邊代起來的話不就是 a srandardized way 嗎?


protect and foil 同是 that 子句裡的動詞,地位相等,這個 and 連接兩個對等的動詞,並不是連接兩個句子,所以沒有斷開喔!

e.g. it 可以指 internet 呀!
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 8 位訪客