Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]OG11th Q16

[問題]OG11th Q16

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG11th Q16

文章kaori110 » 2006-10-13 16:22

16. In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragments dating back one million years. Analysis of the fragments, which came from a variety of animals, showed that they had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood, the most common tree around Swartkans.

Which of the following, if true, would, together with the information above, provide the best basis for the claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids?

(A) The white stinkwood tree is used for building material by the present-day inhabitants of Swartkans.
(B) Forest fires can heat wood to a range of temperatures that occur in campfires.
(C) The bone fragments were fitted together by the archaeologists to form the complete skeletons of several animals.
(D) Apart from the Swartkans discovery, there is reliable evidence that early hominids used fire as many as 500000 years sgo.
(E) The bone fragments were found in several distinct layers of limestone that contained primitive cutting tools known to have been used by early hominids.

----------------------------------------------
answer: (E)

想請教一下
這題是什麼意思阿
後半句我有點看不懂
還有這是怎樣的題型

看解釋好像是strengthen
看完選項不知道到底要選什麼
謝謝解答
kaori110
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 219
註冊時間: 2006-04-29 13:57

文章daphnejw » 2007-04-06 23:29

這一題也困擾我很久,
還是沒有理出思路,
有人可以解題一下嗎?
Tks.
daphnejw
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 57
註冊時間: 2006-10-26 11:56

文章willy48912005 » 2007-09-21 21:49

這題是再問除了"In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragments dating back one million years. Analysis of the fragments, which came from a variety of animals, showed that they had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood, the most common tree around Swartkans"這個條件外, 還需要以下哪一個條件才能證明"the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids"

"the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids"此推論有兩個重點:
1. the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire-->這點題目就直接告訴我們啦,這個charred bone fragments有被燒過的跡象,而且是比在實驗室中用white stinkwood branches所用出來的火還要低的溫度就可以燒啦!
2.所以還差要把1跟early hominds連起來的證據。

答案選E: 因為E用primitive cutting tools...把charred bone fragment的證據跟early hominds連起來。

我這題也做錯,剛剛想出來的...
willy48912005
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 14
註冊時間: 2007-05-09 18:29

文章dibert8 » 2007-09-24 13:01

link (搭橋)題 (i.e. 連連看)
題目給 'fire'--'bone'
問'hominid'??'fire'
解題:把 'hominid' 和 'bone' 連起來 => 'hominid'--'bone'--'fire'
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 6 位訪客