[發問]PP-T1-50

[qqtell]

50. (34317-!-item-!-188;#058&007562)

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.


The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

我對題目的解讀是 參與新研究的科學家們都是因為類似的動機 所以團隊裡其中的一個人將新研究普及化時 其他人不會再把這個人當作是同僚看待

答案為 D選項

想請教各位先進 A的選項哪裡有問題

研究應該是要通力合作 當有成果時是屬於團體而非個人

這樣的假設哪裡有問題??


感謝

[foric0822]

題幹的前面就說了accept as their colleagues those with “similar motivation”
所以前提一定是將出名與動機連結，
至於A是一個無關選項，他跟前提一點關係都沒有
assumption, support, weaken其實都是同一類型的
要在推論過程中去找什麼是原因，什麼是推論
跟推論無關的就優先刪除，另外
GMAT考試的最高原則就是一切的線索都是從題目來，
不要加入自己任何的解釋，不然很難選到正確答案的
還有這題是OG的原題，可以去看看OG的解釋

[qqtell]

恩 感謝您的回答 我再想想自己思考哪裡有問題

[dibert8]

連連看:把定義和對象連起來.
colleague = doing important new research
renown => not colleague = Not doing important new research

[little8]

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.


The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

可以認同D
請教C該怎麼排除?

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague

因為要讓科學家接受同事的條件-是確定那些人和他們有同樣的motivation
是什麼的motivation?就是 doing important new research的人
因此assumption建立在探討這兩者的關係

至於C選項說 一個科學家可以沒有完成任何research變有名,是一個support fact,不是assumption