[問題]GWD12-Q41

[simommmm]

Q41:
The first English settlers to establish a permanent colony in America did it not at Plymouth but along the shore of the James River west of Chesapeake Bay.

A. it not at Playmouth but
B. so not at Playmouth but
C. not at Plymouth but instead
D. not at Plymouth but did so
E. ut not at Plymouth but rather

依稀記得莫北北有說過it和so的不同
但我記憶力差 怎麼也想不起來他說過什麼
有人可以為我解惑嗎??(希望有人可以知道我在胡言亂語些什麼...)

[freshmanduke]

A. it not at Playmouth but


A的it 沒有指代 簡單說不知在講誰
我記的og有一題是在考do so 的用法
你可以查查看
ps: 可是若遇到do it 跟do so 建議選do so 應該錯不了

p.s

[wangdaven]

do it =>前後主詞不同, 做同一件事, 後面的主詞使用it代表前述的動作
ex.(莫伯伯的講義抄下來的)
I haven't got time to buy the tickets. who is going to do "it"?
(S:I, Who)

do so =>前後同個主詞, 做同一件事, 後面的主詞使用so代表前述的動作
ex.(再抄)
She rode a camel; she had never done "so" before.
(S:she, she)

而本題的主詞只有settlers, 用do so不用do it

[puthing]

B. so not at Playmouth but

D. not at Plymouth but did so

第一次看到so就趕快選了.....

而且not at P......but along the shore 看起來很平衡

沒想到後頭還有一個so

請問(B)錯誤的地方是因為but後面沒動詞嗎?

[hplin]

答案不就是 B嗎?

[lucyyeh]

B. so not at Plymouth but
C. not at Plymouth but instead
D. not at Plymouth but did so

這一題我做的時候我想不出有什麼文法規則可以解題，
所以我就慿感覺，可是我覺得B, C, D都很順，
請問C, D錯在哪呢?

[dibert8]

句意
did not at... 沒有意思 (vs 'were not at...')