Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]OG(11th) Q100

[問題]OG(11th) Q100

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG(11th) Q100

文章minimumi » 2007-10-11 07:50

100. One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A)Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager marking the comparisons already employs.

(B)Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly diffcult.

(C)Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

(D)Managers are generallymore respective to new idea that they find outside their own industry.

(E)Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of thier products or markets.


Ans:(E)

每個字都有看懂但就是看不出這題想問什麼 ;''(

完蛋了..
minimumi
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 7
註冊時間: 2007-06-29 12:08

文章dibert8 » 2007-10-11 08:29

做這種題目要隨時記得 EXCEPT 這個字.
公司評比 noncompetitors 而不去評比 competitors, 哪一個不是原因?
(E) 不見得在 noncompetitors 才成立,所以選它.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章minimumi » 2007-10-11 10:22

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT"..

不好意思~
請問這句話可以再多解釋一點嗎?
不太懂問題跟選項之間的關係 :sad
minimumi
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 7
註冊時間: 2007-06-29 12:08

文章dibert8 » 2007-10-11 11:24

Any..."is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies {with which it is not in competition} rather than against competitors" EXCEPT
i.e. 下列皆"是與非競爭者作公司的績效評比而不是與競爭者(評比)的正當理由",除了
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章minimumi » 2007-10-11 11:27

我了解了!
thx :smile
minimumi
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 7
註冊時間: 2007-06-29 12:08


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客