一題GWD .. (我沒有提號)

[lisayang83]

Background information: This year, each film submitted to the Barbizon Film Festival was submitted in one of ten categories. For each

category, there was a panel that decided which submitted films to accept.
Fact 1: Within each category, the rate of acceptance for domestic films was the same as that for foreign films.
Fact 2: The overall rate of acceptance of domestic films was significantly higher than that of foreign films.
In light of the background information, which of the following, if true, can account for fact 1 and fact 2 both being true of the submissions to this year’s Barbizon Film Festival?
1. In each category, the selection panel was composed of filmmakers, and some selection panels included no foreign filmmakers.
2. Significantly more domestic films than foreign films were submitted to the festival.
3. In each of the past three years, the overall acceptance rate was higher for foreign than for domestic films, an outcome that had upset some domestic filmmakers.
4. The number of films to be selected in each category was predetermined, but in no category was it required that the acceptance rate of foreign films should equal that of domestic films.
5. Most foreign films, unlike most domestic films, were submitted in categories with high prestige, but with correspondingly low rates of acceptance.

請問答案是B嗎?!

[lucyyeh]

這題是GWD30-Q14，答案E，站上其實有討論過，可是我也看不太懂，所以我自己想想如下，參考參考
A. 無關
B. 即使參賽本土片比較多，但數量多不表示接受度就會高，也不能解釋Fact 1, 2 這兩個看不太搭的起來的事實
C. 也是無關
D. 數量固定下來(so what!!!)，且就算要求外國片跟本國片接受率要一樣，也不能解釋Fact2為什麼整體本國片接受率還是比較高。
E. 正確答案。大多數的外國片，不像本國片不一樣，都會去丟一些頗負盛名的類別，但這些類別相對的接受率是低的。
反過來說，本國片就會丟"所有類別"，所以可以想見，包括了一些接受率高的類別。所以整體的接受率會比外國片高(解釋了看似矛盾的Fact 2)。