Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - OG(11th) 50

OG(11th) 50

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

OG(11th) 50

文章CherrieLi » 2007-10-03 23:24

50. That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A)That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

(B)That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

(C)It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

(D)It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology

(E)The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said

答案是(D), 我也是選(D), 但我後來仔細地看了(C)選項, 實在看不出哪裡有不妥的地方, 解答上說明: Construction "that it is...who have not" is wordy and awkward(這部份我同意); it also distorts meaning and lacks completion(這部份我不懂, 那裡有扭曲含意呢? 為什麼缺乏完整性呢?)

請幫忙
CherrieLi
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 125
註冊時間: 2007-06-14 21:37

文章lucyyeh » 2007-10-04 09:18

D 選表達了 是 the fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.
C 選who have not anticipated .... 這段字變成修飾educators...那句意變成"沒anticipated the impact of microcomputer tech. 教育者的錯"
那到底是什麼錯,還是沒有講清楚,所以沒有D選句意表達的清楚
lucyyeh
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 410
註冊時間: 2007-03-22 12:20

文章CherrieLi » 2007-10-04 22:59

喔, 是指修飾的名詞不一樣, 對吧?
CherrieLi
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 125
註冊時間: 2007-06-14 21:37

文章dibert8 » 2007-10-08 11:33

這題像在考虛主詞的用法.
(A) it 虛主詞無所指(應該是 it is... that... 的結構);頭重腳輕
(B) That 子句當主詞,改變句意
(C) 第二個 it 虛主詞無所指
(D) It = that... 虛主詞的正確用法
(E) 意同 (B)
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章chencraig0227 » 2007-11-11 16:24

dibert8 \$m[1]:這題像在考虛主詞的用法.
(A) it 虛主詞無所指(應該是 it is... that... 的結構);頭重腳輕
(B) That 子句當主詞,改變句意
(C) 第二個 it 虛主詞無所指
(D) It = that... 虛主詞的正確用法
(E) 意同 (B)


同意!
在補充一下!

It is that的虛主詞構句僅能擺句首(根據自己理解)! 因為這時的it可以指代that的子句!
可是it 擺句中的話就要有明顯指代的東西,不能像虛主詞構句一樣!!

另外! it的虛主詞構句通常that後面表達句子的重心! C選項怎麼看兩個it is都很醜!
而且兩個重心...一堆邏輯上錯誤! 所以OG的解釋才會用...這麼多龍統的形容詞說他錯!!

補充說明:OG對AB的解釋我覺得很妙歐! That為句首引導的附屬子句應該
直接接主要句子,不應該再接附屬子句。恩恩! 要體會一下!
頭像
chencraig0227
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 236
註冊時間: 2007-08-09 22:53


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 9 位訪客