For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed、a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo、but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.
The claims above、if true、most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria、a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful、international opinion must be unanimous.
答案是d
我想要問的是b選項
為什麼錯呢? As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria、a trade embargo is likely to succeed
這句話從上文推下來沒有錯阿
解答上是說the conclusion contradicts the given information and so it is not justified. 是說因為他的前提假設跟題目相反所以不能選ㄇ
但是我記得有一題og 11th 51題
Biometric access-control systems-those using fingerprints、voiceprints、and so forth、to regulate admittance to restricted areas-work by degrees of similarity、not by identity. After all、even the same finger will rarely leave exactly identical prints. Such systems can be adjusted to minimize refusals of access to legitimate access-seekers. Such adjustments、however、increase the likelihood of admitting impostors.
Which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by the information above?
B.if a Biometric access-control system reliably prevents impostors from being admitted、it will sometimes turn away legitimate access-seekers.
他的conclusion的答案也是跟原題的假設相反阿
我有點搞糊塗了
拜託各位牛人幫幫我阿
我每次遇到這題就搞糊塗
快要考試啦>"<