Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD31-37~救命啊!!(有一篇已發布的不能回覆我只好再開,sorry)

GWD31-37~救命啊!!(有一篇已發布的不能回覆我只好再開,sorry)

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD31-37~救命啊!!(有一篇已發布的不能回覆我只好再開,sorry)

文章auguding » 2007-12-18 13:36

In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson of the federal advisory committee of experts they assigned to do a report on the history and ethics of the government’s radiation experiments on humans in the 1950’s and 1960’s .

A. they assigned to do
B. to be assigned doing
C. that was being assigned doing
D. assigned for doing
E. it assigned to do

答案是E~但是我實在不解
另ㄧ篇回文說是省略了whom
而it是指white house
但我有點不懂~這題句意是說:
white house在1994年任命Dr RuthR. Faden 為chairperson of the federal advisory committee of experts
那是說這個機構組織~被assign去做report on the history and ethics of the government’s radiation experiments on humans in the 1950’s and 1960’s .

那這樣的話~為何不可選D?
assign好像後面可以加to/for
原本我是選B~但是assign+ving好像沒這用法?
所以我想選D~
因為我不懂why可省略whom還有E選的整句意思也怪怪的?!請高手救命啊!!
拜託了~感激!!! :|||
auguding
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 148
註冊時間: 2006-03-04 21:09

文章dibert8 » 2007-12-18 14:04

看 (A) 的樣子, white house 不是 they ,改成 it 就是 (E) 囉!
句子: white house named Dr RuthR. Faden ... to do ... 中間小插曲不需太費心, Dr RuthR. Faden 人囉,提名去做事,用 to +V.
省略 whom (= experts) 有一說是 that (= committee).
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章auguding » 2007-12-19 04:50

我有點不懂說...
whom可以直接這樣給他刪掉嗎?
那WHY(D)選不能
我覺得這個name應該是說name這個人為那個組織的chairperson~而他們被指派去做一個report....
啊所以是(that/whom are) assigned for doing~~~


找到類似原文~
Dr. Faden was named by the White House this week as chairwoman of the Federal advisory committee of experts that has been assigned to assess the history and ethics of the Government's radiation experiments on humans that have been recently receiving so much attention.

我還是支持D~~請指教啊!!THANKS
auguding
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 148
註冊時間: 2006-03-04 21:09

文章davidpcwang » 2007-12-19 06:14

我覺得 D 的意思會變成 committee of experts "assigned" 而不是 the white house
頭像
davidpcwang
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 44
註冊時間: 2005-08-17 10:04

文章auguding » 2007-12-19 15:01

但是我不懂ㄟ~
可以就直接把that刪掉嗎?
但是要說變成committee of experts "assigned"~就是除非一樣因為that/whom可以直接刪才會有這樣的疑慮
我原本的想法是:(that are) assigned~所以就OK吧?

所以我的問題點還是卡在~為何whom or that可以就刪掉咧~句子變的怪怪的
而依原文句意~確實是說Dr. Faden被任命為主席~那ㄍ組織是要去做那個report的~~~~

困惑~
auguding
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 148
註冊時間: 2006-03-04 21:09

文章sunnyblue13s » 2008-03-04 16:39

auguding \$m[1]:但是我不懂ㄟ~
可以就直接把that刪掉嗎?
但是要說變成committee of experts "assigned"~就是除非一樣因為that/whom可以直接刪才會有這樣的疑慮
我原本的想法是:(that are) assigned~所以就OK吧?

所以我的問題點還是卡在~為何whom or that可以就刪掉咧~句子變的怪怪的
而依原文句意~確實是說Dr. Faden被任命為主席~那ㄍ組織是要去做那個report的~~~~

困惑~
Dr. Faden was named by the White House this week as chairwoman of the Federal advisory committee of experts (whom) it assigned to do assess the history and ethics of the Government's radiation experiments on humans that have been recently receiving so much attention.

experts = whom; 受詞可以省略...有簡潔的效果... 修飾不會有歧意...

assigned+後面一串 修飾experts 明顯語意有問題....
sunnyblue13s
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 236
註冊時間: 2006-01-18 23:05
來自: Phoenix, AZ

文章yilingsky » 2008-03-31 20:03

查了一下gooal~~

assign for sth./sb. (assign for 後面只能加名詞)

assign to do sth.
yilingsky
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 26
註冊時間: 2006-01-17 14:41


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 10 位訪客