實在不知道怎麼說,應該是實力不夠,努力不夠的結果。
與大家分享一下JJ
CR
Q3:
GWD32-Q1
The cause
of the wreck of the ship Edmund Fitzgeraid in a severe storm on lake Superior
is still unknown , when the sunken wreckage of the vessel was found, searchers
discovered the hull in two pieces lying close together, The storm’s violent
waves would have caused separate pieces floating even briefly on the surface to
drift apart. Therefore, the breakup of the null can be ruled out as the cause
of the sinking.
Which of
the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Ships
as large as the Edmund Fitzgerald rarely sink except in the most violent
weather.
B. Under
water currents at the time of the storm did not move the separated pieces of
the hull together again.
C. Pieces
of the hull would have sunk more quickly than the intact hull would have
D. The
waves of the storm were not violent enough to have caused the breakup
E. If the ship broke up before sinking , the pieces of the hull would not have
remained on the surface for very long
AWA
Issue:
33. “People are likely to accept as a leader only
someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or
she expects others to perform.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or
disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or
examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Argument
16. The following appeared as part of an article in the education
section of a Waymarsh City newspaper.
“Throughout the last two decades, those who earned graduate degrees
found it very difficult to get jobs teaching their academic specialties at the
college level. Those with graduate degrees from Waymarsh University had an
especially hard time finding such jobs. But better times are coming in the next
decade for all academic job seekers, including those from Waymarsh. Demographic
trends indicate that an increasing number of people will be reaching college
age over the next ten years; consequently, we can expect that the job market
will improve dramatically for people seeking college-level teaching positions
in their fields.”
RC JJ我遇到3篇,但我第一篇不是(至少不是我至昨天考前看的40篇之一),估計應是此題讓分數砸了,沒辦法,實力不夠。
我的第一篇是講鳥類的行為
提到"male" incubation的行為(這個字不會的一定要背下來,不然後面很難看懂)
然後關於這種行為有兩種Hypothesis 來解釋
第一個....忘了...
第二個....跟predator有關
這兩個假說的理論我都看不太懂,有提到一些像nest, temperature...等factors,
補充
很抱歉,因為讀的時候沒有很懂,所以我現在很難回想太多細節
但關鍵字就是male incubation, 然後注意那兩個假說。
網路上有一篇文章講的跟考試文章講的行為有點像(這是我目前找到最像的)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_o ... 20a549f936
可是考試的文章比較簡潔,用字不一樣,並昨重在假說的解釋。所以上面的看看就好。
或許熟悉老JJ的xdjm可以根據我的線索找的到老JJ了
然後就這麼短短一篇,好像,才一段,幾個句子,文章主要繞著那兩個Hypothesis解釋,大家考到不管字有多難,都建議要耐心的分析出關係
因為,第一提示考第二個假說,第二題考第一個假說,根本沒得逃。
沒有任何訣竅,一定要懂才選的出來,我想我這兩題都掛了。
第三題是考主旨,忘了選什麼,不過我想這題大家都選的出來。
其他的RC JJ
分別是 加拿大鐵路、討論美國女權運動的由來(難+長)、英國在伊朗的公司(GWD)
Math...我是數學白痴....考試還靠大家幫忙,硬背了幾題上場才得以及時把題目做完,功力太差,背不起來,就不誤導大家了。
最近覺得GMAC的題庫變大了...似乎越來越不能取巧....唉....高分難求
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
一點心得
660(M49, V31)
這是五個月我考四次的成果,這次V還比上次倒退一分,
考這麼多次的結果,就是讓我知道運氣與實力的那條界線是在哪。
其實考完我真是不想考了,可是我就是想到前幾天還有在傷咖,
看到一些前輩分享的心路歷程,讓我覺得分數其實沒什麼,
但就是這個努力的過程,與自己挑戰的經驗會讓自己成長。
因此,這年度的最後一次機會,還是給他考吧!
也給所有還在努力的G友打打氣,考到上限的人還是有的,加油了!