Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]Prep-T2-Q21

[問題]Prep-T2-Q21

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]Prep-T2-Q21

文章little8 » 2007-11-15 18:17

21. (28114-!-item-!-188;#058&003832)

Film Director: It is true that certain characters and plot twists in my newly released film The Big Heist are strikingly similar to characters and plot twists in Thieves, a movie that came out last year. Based on these similarities, the film studio that produced Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film. The accusation is clearly without merit. All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director's rejection of the accusation?

(A) Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
(B) The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
(C) The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
(D) The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
(E) The time it took to produce The Big Heist was considerably shorter than the time it took to produce Thieves.


答案C 我選E

請問答案C正確是因為這類型的電影都有相同的腳色和劇情轉折,所以不算抄襲?

答案E,說明製作時間較短,是否也可支持不算抄襲?還是因為前提提到,重複前提?

呵呵,怎麼覺得自己有點自問自答... ;HH

也請大大幫忙看看我這樣思路是否正確呢?
little8
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 123
註冊時間: 2006-11-05 05:32

文章阿琪 » 2007-11-15 19:21

思路點: 抄襲成不成立!!

(C)的解讀應該是…
" 製作Thieves的這家film studio 很少做這一類的電影~"
~這樣的論述應該無法排除被抄襲的問題~~因為重點是在idea被抄襲,並非是否為他們很少做的那一類!! 既使很少做那一類,一樣會有被抄襲問題!!!(不但偏離核心思路,而且無意義,不正確)

(E)製作時間較短仍有抄襲的疑慮~可以表示他們抄Thieves 的idea後,快速製作出來~~(無法支持)

切中核心問題的反而是(B)
因為如果早期許多電影都是類似這樣的idea,那何嘗談的上他們互相抄襲!所以很有力的強化了director's rejection of the accusation:the Big Heist 沒有抄Thieves ~~因為兩部電影的idea都是跟以前的電影是類似的~

答案應該是(B)


以上參考○魯!!
-------Vision;Passion; Determination; Persistence; Innovation-------
頭像
阿琪
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 129
註冊時間: 2005-06-07 18:14

文章little8 » 2007-11-16 08:41

呵呵,答案也可以抄錯...是B啦~~~
感謝回答
little8
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 123
註冊時間: 2006-11-05 05:32

文章hasaying » 2007-12-28 22:42

那請問一下A的部份是錯再哪裡呢? 他的腳本是早就流通在片廠間的話......不是就跟B很類似? 還是說 A 選項的腳本還是屬於Thieves 的,不是共享的,所以才錯?
hasaying
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 5
註冊時間: 2007-04-29 13:44

文章yucih » 2007-12-29 11:11

hasaying \$m[1]:那請問一下A的部份是錯再哪裡呢? 他的腳本是早就流通在片廠間的話......不是就跟B很類似? 還是說 A 選項的腳本還是屬於Thieves 的,不是共享的,所以才錯?


我的看法是
(A) Before Thieves Began production, its script had been circulating.....
因此 在T拍片前 角本已經在外流通 所以B也可以取得 而抄取T的ideas
---> support accusation

(B)The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.

the characters and plot twists 不是T特有的是以前就有 只是他們的參考來源相同 自然情節會類似
--->reject accusation

這樣講不知道會不會很複雜 ><.. 希望你能了解
yucih
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 8
註冊時間: 2006-09-27 14:05

文章hasaying » 2007-12-30 21:51

喔...所以我過分推理腳本的意思了。所以這個script還是屬於Thieves 的,不是獨立的就是了......

清楚清楚~ 謝謝!
hasaying
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 5
註冊時間: 2007-04-29 13:44

樹上爬

文章chris8888 » 2008-01-20 11:23

Film Director: It is true that certain characters and plot twists in my newly released film The Big Heist are strikingly similar to characters and plot twists in Thieves, a movie that came out last year.
電影導演 : 我的一個電影和去年的一部電影Thieves的人物角色與特色和劇情轉折極為相似
Based on these similarities, the film studio that produced Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film.
製作Thieves的人要控訴我抄襲他的電影思路
The accusation is clearly without merit.
這控訴絲毫沒有法律的依據
All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.
所有的BH電影製作實際上都在Thieves被上映前的幾個月完成了
(法律控訴有關情節轉折與人物特徵的所有權歸屬)

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director's rejection of the accusation?

(A) Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
我有兩點質疑
1. The characters and plot twists 可以等於 script嗎? 如果不可以, 那A立刻失效. 無關選項 irrelevant
2. 在Thieves開拍之前, 它的腳本script, 就曾經流落在外, 包含BH的電影, 這無法有效支持, 因為這句話已經說明了script是屬於Thieves的, 指示他尚未開拍, 卻被BH給拿去用了. 無法支持此導演向法官抗辯, script所有權確實是Thieves的
總結 : 無法支持
(B) The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
最相似的人物特色和情節轉折在這兩部電影裡面有著非常密切的相似度, 在早先的相同文藝創作的電影中 (意思說不要五十步笑百步, 誰抄襲誰還不知道呢? 這樣的控訴顯然無效, 因為導演極為可能不是抄襲控告者的)
(C) The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
是否常常製作相關的電影也無關
總結 : 無關選項
(D) The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
導演伊起工作多久無關
總結 : 無關選項
(E) The time it took to produce The Big Heist was considerably shorter than the time it took to produce Thieves.
不是製作時間的問題
總結 : 無關選項
頭像
chris8888
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 444
註冊時間: 2007-07-31 22:47


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 5 位訪客