fannywu94 \$m[1]:Q20:
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
A.A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
不好意思我想問一下(A)，當初竟然一看到A，很開心的就選了
因為看到文章中的那句話：Levaska’s government會做這件事情，除非戶頭持有人在65歲以前把錢領出來
而選項A說：有實際的數目顯示Levaskans的居民已經把投資在special accounts的錢領出來了，那這樣換句話說不就是證明政府的計畫沒辦法繼續做
想請教各位大大不曉得我的思路問題在哪裡？？嗚嗚∼救命阿。。我的邏輯真的不太行
藍色的字...重點是...文章說special account有million dollar存進去了！
所以得出了一個結論是這個計畫顯然成功了！
題目要weaken政府這個計畫不成功...
而A選項，跟文章整個不合...
因為有已經有million在裡面啦！
我是不知道邏輯上這應該叫什麼錯誤
不過，如果你再看看D選項的話，才會覺得D有weaken到...
因為D說的意思是大家把短期轉入這個special account裡，符合了文章確實有million dollar流入，而又weaken了政府這個計畫，並沒有使人民存錢進去，而只是把本來存在裡面的錢轉到這個帳戶裡而已...
邏輯我也很爛...多練習吧！一起加加油囉！
