FT MBA Ranking 2008

由 **ebyayaya** » 2008-01-29 07:25

Latest ranking information for your reference.

http://media.ft.com/cms/9fe070e6-ca70-1 ... b07658.pdf

由 **lunar916** » 2008-01-31 07:37

Kellogg 排 24
Berkeley 排 32
恩... 不知道ㄟ.. 感覺怪怪的...

由 **modern** » 2008-01-31 23:15

FT自說自話,methodology亂槁,indicator亂用,早就不知道被笑翻到哪去了...
頗有謝小夫之風也 :P

--
謝小夫名言:我"認為"馬囧的綠卡還有效,隨時可以ooxx...
X老師咧,你"認為"就算數的話那我認為我是哈佛畢業,行不行阿.....

由 **zuckzhc** » 2008-02-08 03:29

I think you need to show people more about your arguement. You may not necessary agree with FT's ranking. However, accusing them for messing up with the methodology and using wrong indicator is another issue.

modern \$m[1]:FT自說自話,methodology亂槁,indicator亂用,早就不知道被笑翻到哪去了...
頗有謝小夫之風也 :P

--
謝小夫名言:我"認為"馬囧的綠卡還有效,隨時可以ooxx...
X老師咧,你"認為"就算數的話那我認為我是哈佛畢業,行不行阿.....

由 **markhuang** » 2008-02-10 05:15

I think FT focus more on "salary". Therefore, top-tier schools are the schools that generate more bankers.
If the candidates care about post-MBA compensation (in 3 years), FT ranking is a good reference.

FT MBA Ranking 2008

FT MBA Ranking 2008

誰在線上