GWD1-21

[8妹]

That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1,000-year-old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona, has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exist.

1.That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating
2.Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation
3.Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating
4.Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating
5.The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation


想請問1.哪些地方錯 :-$

[Behemoth]

trish 不聽話 沒畫線!!! 該打屁股

1.錯在were跟has不搭嘎

[8妹]

trish 不聽話 沒畫線!!! 該打屁股

1.錯在were跟has不搭嘎

: 我竟然沒發現were/has

我才六歲,容易忘都忘西滴~~~

[bugubugu]

trish 不聽話 沒畫線!!! 該打屁股

1.錯在were跟has不搭嘎

B爺阿~B爺~

1的主詞是That...
所以可以用has...只是句意會很怪....

這題討論過囉...
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopi ... ght=#17856
板主麻煩做個連結....

[micht]

trish 不聽話 沒畫線!!! 該打屁股

1.錯在were跟has不搭嘎

哈哈哈...............B爺好兇喔
tirsh8m 怕怕..........(不過 板主竟敢忘版規....來 家法拿來)

[Behemoth]

trish 不聽話 沒畫線!!! 該打屁股

1.錯在were跟has不搭嘎

B爺阿~B爺~

1的主詞是That...
所以可以用has...只是句意會很怪....

這題討論過囉...
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopi ... ght=#17856
板主麻煩做個連結....

我不是說has錯
我是說were跟has一起用錯

另外你那邊說的the n of n 那點也是對的 (Y)

[soami]

trish 不聽話 沒畫線!!! 該打屁股

1.錯在were跟has不搭嘎

B爺阿~B爺~

1的主詞是That...
所以可以用has...只是句意會很怪....

這題討論過囉...
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopi ... ght=#17856
板主麻煩做個連結....

我不是說has錯
我是說were跟has一起用錯

另外你那邊說的the n of n 那點也是對的 (Y)

請教一下 were has 一起用錯誤是指時態錯誤還是一致性錯誤。

ex :1. That the students are bad boys is a well known fact.
這邊雖然不一致但是實際上沒有問題


2. That the students were bad boys is a well known fact.
時態不一致但是句意也沒有錯誤，大家都知道那些學生過去惡名昭彰

[cocaine]

我覺得不是時態問題..
A,E意思都差不多..
但是我覺得A寫的比較囉唆..
主要就是要說發現那些瓷器這些東西讓後面的xx變成2倍左右哩...
那能用N詞去描述,為何要去N詞子句去描述哩...

[soami]

我覺得不是時態問題..
A,E意思都差不多..
但是我覺得A寫的比較囉唆..
主要就是要說發現那些瓷器這些東西讓後面的xx變成2倍左右哩...
那能用N詞去描述,為何要去N詞子句去描述哩...

a 不好是因為excavating的關係
雖然意思差不多，用that子句當主詞我覺得不能說它是個囉唆的用法
它是強調 that twenty-one ceramic dog figurines dog were discovered during the excavating 這個挖掘動作 has doubled xxx

和discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog during the excavation has doubled
還是有一點細微的差異

[chloemoney]

請教一下大家，綜合來看E得確是唯一正確的答案，但是我覺得句意上還是有些怪怪的，因為它是用 the dixcovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines 來 doubled the number.....

我一開始的時候是選B，當然B是錯的，因為他的S是複數，題目是has nearly doubled .....

這題誏我聯想到OG-49

49. The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet
(A)which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting
(B)doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known to orbit
(C)which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known in orbit around
(D)doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting
(E)which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known that orbit

答案是b, 題目則是six moons 來double the number of satellites

[撥撥]

2.Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation
3.Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating

可不可以問問大家
during => at
有沒有改變句意之嫌？

[ustoday]

A 跟E 到底差別在哪
當初就是想that 表後面整句內容 感覺比E 要清楚 所以選A

[cheyen]

從網上看到：http://www.archaeology.org/0107/newsbriefs/dogs.html與E差不多幾乎一模一樣(文章的第一句)

[suechi915]

太厲害了
竟然找到這麼相似的文章，感謝cheyen

我覺得A 是說 "21 ceramic dog figurines were discovered..." 這件事 double the number. 怪異
應該是E. "這一次的發現(N.)"(21 ceramic dog figurines) double...
也不是C. 發現(V.)這個動作double...
而B 我覺得topic並不是要強調這21 figurines，是要強調這一次的發現
D則改變句意了，這一次發現總共就21個，並不是其中的21個double...

[juyu]

我也是真的很佩服...這到底是怎麼辦到的..幾乎一模一樣的句子..