fei -fei-15

[魚]

15. Dental researcher: Filling a cavity in a tooth is not a harmless procedure: it inevitably damages some of the healthy parts of the tooth. Cavities are harmful only if the decay reaches the nerves inside the tooth, and many cavities, if left untreated, never progress to that point. Therefore, dentists should not fill a cavity unless the nerves inside the tooth are in imminent danger from that cavity.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most strongly supports the researcher’s reasoning?

A. Dentists should perform any procedure that is likely to be [highlight=yellow]beneficial[/highlight] in the long term, but only if the procedure does not cause immediate damage.
B. Dentists should help their patients to prevent cavities rather than waiting until cavities are present to begin treatment.
C. A condition that is only potentially harmful should not be treated using a method that is definitely harmful.
D. A condition that is typically progressive should not be treated using methods that provide only temporary relief.
E. A condition that is potentially harmful should not be left untreated unless it can be kept under constant surveillance.

正確答案為 C

我想請教 :

1. 排除A 的方法 , 是否是因為這個benificial 的態度太active ? 或是?

2.我將C歸類為原文濃縮 ,這樣的歸類是否正確 ?

謝謝 :D

[Behemoth]

這提問支持
題目說補牙齒有時候不好,所以乾脆不要補了
所以c很好的說出這個論點,等於像paraphrase
a的意思完全不對囉

[魚]

a的意思完全不對囉

嗯 這就是我的罩門 (Iaa)

我判斷的時候 挑了 A / C 來比 , 只是覺得 A 是態度太over了 才踢掉的

B 爺說 A 是完全不對 , 為啥 ? 可以再給我指點一下嗎 :D :D :D

[Behemoth]

題目說補牙齒有時候不好,所以乾脆不要補了 (但是其實不補是有害的)

你要找一個跟這個配合的來支持

a一點也不配合呀 還說到長短期的問題 這是題目裡完全沒說到的

你在看看...

[魚]

繼續 ~ B 爺

我知道 C 素對的喔 , 偶不是要問"如何解題" 我想找出我的盲點

另外 ,我覺得那個長期短期還好耶 ,因為是句內互相對應 ,沒有太嚴重的錯誤, 因為這樣判斷是無關選項嗎 ?

Dental researcher: Filling a cavity in a tooth is not a harmless procedure: it inevitably damages some of the healthy parts of the tooth. Cavities are harmful only if the decay reaches the nerves inside the tooth, and many cavities, if left untreated, never progress to that point. Therefore, dentists should not fill a cavity unless the nerves inside the tooth are in imminent danger from that cavity.

Describe :補牙不是全然無害的.這無可避免的會傷害到周邊的健康牙齒.蛀牙只有在傷害到神經時才是有害的.而很多蛀牙其實就算不處理也不會傷到神經.
Assert : 除非有立即性的危險,否則不必處理蛀牙.

好 ~ A 來嚕

A. Dentists should perform any procedure that is likely to be beneficial in the long term, but only if the procedure does not cause immediate damage.


除了會當下造成立即性傷害的療程外 ,牙醫應該要對牙齒做任何就長期而言是有益的保健處理.

很明顯 ,article 的立論重心在前面 (補蛀牙--立即性傷害 , 無立即傷害-可不理會 (也就是C) )

問題來了 ~ 我的問題是 , 如果沒有C , 可以選 A 嗎

[Behemoth]

重來一次

題目重點在---補蛀牙實際上短期是有好處的,並不是考慮到長期才要補

a說,只有在短期沒有害時,才可以做長期有利的措施

但是,a說短期沒有害並不代表短期就有好處啊

所以不能選

再者,我認為這裡也沒講到長期有沒有好處的觀念

[魚]

所以你說他無關的原因是因為跟題目設計所要打的邏輯觀點是不同的 是醬嗎 ?

[Behemoth]

我猜你說不停 是要說不同

那麼你說對了 是不同的

[魚]

沒有　Ｃ　的話　你會想要選　Ａ　嗎

[Behemoth]

不會耶

我覺得講的是不同的東西

[micht]

我覺得............此題focus 在 "condition"

不是...醫生應該採用什麼樣的 措施預防damages..................


題目講來講去都是病人的蛀牙嚴重程度.........><

[Behemoth]

耶 金剛你也來玩了啊

不然都是我跟魚 挺無聊的

[魚]

大 高興 (d10)