gwd24-Q22

[dibert8]

When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly.
因為有 ankle fractures 的 X 光都 'reviewed', 證實沒有誤判,因此再照 X 光浪費錢. (C) X-rays ... were reviewed 支持這樣的說法.

[lucyyeh]

這一題今天複習才終於茅塞頓開，

如果把題目的 When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, 這句話，換成C 選，就很順了。

(沒辦法，其他選項也不對)

[dibert8]

題幹上討論的還是那群有fracture的人

選擇C的原因是
題目上說
When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
今天作者憑什麼說follow-up x-ray浪費
是憑著有個review說follow-up的結果其實都很stable根本不用follow
所以要strengthen這個argument
就要去strengthen這個review的可信度

應該就是這個理解.
i.e. 因為有 review, 而 "follow-up的結果其實都很stable根本不用follow", 所以 order follow-up x-rays 顯然浪費錢了.

[chencraig0227]

題幹上討論的還是那群有fracture的人

選擇C的原因是
題目上說
When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
今天作者憑什麼說follow-up x-ray浪費
是憑著有個review說follow-up的結果其實都很stable根本不用follow
所以要strengthen這個argument
就要去strengthen這個review的可信度

應該就是這個理解.
i.e. 因為有 review, 而 "follow-up的結果其實都很stable根本不用follow", 所以 order follow-up x-rays 顯然浪費錢了.

I support C.

(C)簡單而言就是：一開始的X ray檢查報告，就已經被review過了。沒必要再拍第二次浪費錢。

[pinkdreamland]

想再多補充選項(C)是加強support的條件更具有充分條件
support:題目的 When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, 這句話

(C)X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
這些病人的整形外科醫生:不是單一,而是很多不ㄧ樣的醫生
另外這些醫生其實也並非同一家醫院,而是不ㄧ樣的醫院
所以結論是並非給特定單一的醫生檢查,而是給其他多位不同醫院的醫生檢查背書,如此更加強X-ray不會誤判

第一次做這題,看到several錯以為是some,匆匆以為代表性不足就錯殺了這個選項,查了Longman的解釋
several=different and separate

考點也應該是orthopedists,英文厲害就是有s

不知道這樣解釋對不對...