Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - PP-T1-19

PP-T1-19

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

PP-T1-19

文章Huang Hsin-Yi » 2008-03-05 18:42

19. (27995-!-item-!-188;#058&003473)

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will soon decrease.無關
(B) Importing either grain or meat will not result in a significantly higher percentage of Gortlanders' incomes being spent on food than is currently the case.無關
(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is increasing at roughly the same rate across all income levels.平行資訊
(D) The per capita income of meat producers in Gortland is rising faster than the per capita income of grain producers. 無關
(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.

Ans:E

有一點我還是不懂,
E的意思:喜歡吃肉的,若沒減少穀物的消費,則G國得進口
相否的喜歡吃肉的,若減少穀物消費,則G不用進口穀物

但肉不是也要好多穀物才能生產嗎,因此如果肉增加,G國不是都得進口穀物嗎
這樣這個前提有效嗎?
哪裡錯了 ;-S
Huang Hsin-Yi
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1038
註冊時間: 2007-08-17 00:41
來自: Tainan

文章lucyyeh » 2008-03-05 19:57

我想那個radically在此也講了減少的程度了
反之,如食肉後即radically 減少吃穀物,是有可能食物夠,不需進口。
lucyyeh
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 410
註冊時間: 2007-03-22 12:20

文章Huang Hsin-Yi » 2008-03-05 20:01

原來是這樣,謝謝
Huang Hsin-Yi
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1038
註冊時間: 2007-08-17 00:41
來自: Tainan

文章larry.tw » 2008-06-08 16:00

這題答案同OG11-56
雖然中文字思可以了解
這題應該是用選項"取非"然後"推翻結論"來找答案,可是我怎麼弄也連結不起來~~~

(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.
選項取非就變成 increase meat consumption -> decrease grain consumption

結論:
Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.
這樣不就support結論了嗎??沒有推翻阿!!??

不知道大家懂不懂我的問題@@??
還是我哪裡弄錯了~~請指教!
larry.tw
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 155
註冊時間: 2007-01-10 16:45

文章Huang Hsin-Yi » 2008-06-13 21:42

larry.tw \$m[1]:這題答案同OG11-56
雖然中文字思可以了解
這題應該是用選項"取非"然後"推翻結論"來找答案,可是我怎麼弄也連結不起來~~~

(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.
選項取非就變成 increase meat consumption -> decrease grain consumption
如果少吃穀物,需求減少,就不需進口,結論不成立

結論:
Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.
這樣不就support結論了嗎??沒有推翻阿!!??

不知道大家懂不懂我的問題@@??
還是我哪裡弄錯了~~請指教!
Huang Hsin-Yi
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1038
註冊時間: 2007-08-17 00:41
來自: Tainan


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 3 位訪客