Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]GWD7-Q10~Q12

[問題]GWD7-Q10~Q12

GMAT 考的是閱讀....閱讀....還是閱讀....

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]GWD7-Q10~Q12

文章bugubugu » 2004-12-11 13:17

Q10 to Q12: 請問我用紅字弄起來的地方中文是甚麼意思阿?

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
1980’s that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideology of “republican
Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
United States. Kerber maintained that
the leaders of the new nation wanted
women to be educated in order to raise
politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citi-
(10) zenry was considered essential to the
success of the country’s republican form
of government; virtue was to be instilled
not only by churches and schools, but
by families, where the mother’s role
(15) was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber,
motherhood became pivotal to the fate
of the republic, providing justification for
an unprecedented attention to female
education.
(20) Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography. Prior to Kerber’s work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work is the notable exception. Examining
newspaper advertisements for acade-
mies, Woody found that educational
opportunities increased for both girls
and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An
(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.
Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what
extent the Revolution really changed
women’s lives.


還有請問一下, 看不懂Q12為何選B?
可否幫忙解釋一下?
謝謝!

Q12: The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?

A. The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century
B. The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution
C. The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution
D. Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century
E. Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章liwuu » 2004-12-14 21:30

紅色部分表示採用Kerber學說的歷史學家將無法有效顯現Woody所描述的趨勢...即Revolution對women's lives的影響
(這一部分也正是Q12所問的東西)
簡單來說,Woody所描述研究的主要是在Revolution之前的狀況...而Kerber所研究的是Revolution之後的狀況
兩者學說的差異會顯現在prior to the American Revolution
夫妻同心,其利斷金...Magical Mr. MISTOFFELEES
昂首千丘遠,嘯傲風間;堪尋敵手共論劍,高處不勝寒
頭像
liwuu
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 1639
註冊時間: 2004-11-17 06:02

文章kikisky » 2004-12-18 01:36

B爺~~
偶要改答案~~~~~



Q12
的答案...............
嗯..................D比較好ㄛ~~
至少徐老師是選這枚ㄋㄟ~~

(還是 已經改了~只是偶不知道??? i89 )

ps.照醬看來~~bugubugu & liwuu 是選B的意思嗎???
那可以解釋一下D為什麼被踢掉的原因嗎?????
頭像
kikisky
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 745
註冊時間: 2004-10-29 11:41

文章Behemoth » 2004-12-18 10:11

這題我還是想選bㄟ

題目問兩者不同

d裡面並沒有說出兩者的不同啊

請賜教~
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

文章bugubugu » 2004-12-18 15:55

Behemoth \$m[1]:這題我還是想選bㄟ

題目問兩者不同

d裡面並沒有說出兩者的不同啊

請賜教~


其實我是選D耶...
不過我猜啦...
題目是要問說Kerber和Woody不同處在Woody主要關心哪方面的事...
D是Kerber關心的事....所以錯...
我之前看這題以為是要找Kerber的觀點...
不過仔細看primarily concerning是修釋Woody's (work)...
所以應該是B才對...
不知我對題目認知有沒有錯....
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章Behemoth » 2004-12-18 18:00

題目是要問兩者不同

所以找兩個不一樣的地方
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

文章kikisky » 2004-12-20 01:54

可惜
我忘了把老師講解的錄音起來~像kyo一樣 ^^
不過
我想
我的腦子
應該不會記錯才是


bugubugu \$m[1]:
不過仔細看primarily concerning是修釋Woody's (work)...
所以應該是B才對...
不知我對題目認知有沒有錯....

我看不太懂你說的真正意思
不過
看起來有點半對的感覺
不過~
bugubugu的結論還是選B??(へな~)

這一題的重點放在which (of the following)的身上
所以
答案選項的主詞是閱讀重點

1.extent 是表本質相同,但程度上的變化不合題目問的differ from
2.既然有support字眼出現==>表相同概念===>又怎麼能選
3.prior to 雖然有點明不同處,蛋,請注意答案選項的主詞是閱讀重點,prior to 僅帶出修飾的部份,並非真正閱讀重心

Behemoth \$m[1]:

題目問兩者不同

d裡面並沒有說出兩者的不同啊



4.D選項中的動詞change不就是代表著改變嗎?===>不就有"不同"的味道了嗎?
而且我記得老師也說過change的改變,隱含著contrast的意思==>不就和differ呼應著嗎???

嗯~就醬了~ i96
頭像
kikisky
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 745
註冊時間: 2004-10-29 11:41

文章 » 2004-12-21 23:02

原來連結躲在這,

今天做了一下這一回,

D 是很清楚的答案

因為題目問的是
Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following

請回想一下文章的結構

老K 認為是republication 之後才有因應政策產生的Female education enhance

老W則是令人驚艷的去翻報紙小廣告作調查 發現早在這之前 femle education 已經受到重視了

D 選項與這兩者的態度 及最後一段作了呼應

B 用徐老師的方法 ,從 extent....看到support 就可以刪了 <-------因為態度是錯的, 原因同樓上KIKI妹 (L)
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Calvin » 2004-12-28 03:44

D is not right.

the answer should be B.

"whether.......changed during the eighteem centry" is not the difference between K and W, since they both agree that attitude changed during the eighteen centry.
頭像
Calvin
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1155
註冊時間: 2004-12-28 02:46

文章micht » 2004-12-28 10:03

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
1980’s that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783),
an ideology of “republican
Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
United States


Woody found that educational
opportunities increased for both girls
and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An
(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.


B. The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution

我選(B)
Kerber說是 American Revolution之後
Woody說是 pior to American Revolution


同意Calvin 指出的 American Revolution之後 Kerber & Woody都agree attitdue changed. 但是 何時開始???? (這裡是他兩不同之處)
圖檔圖檔圖檔
頭像
micht
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3276
註冊時間: 2004-09-27 12:13

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-01-10 19:05

同意micht牛人
解說一下這篇好了

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
1980’s
that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideologyof “republican
Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
United States
. Kerber maintained that
the leaders of the new nation wanted
women to be educated in order to raise
politically virtuous sons
. A virtuous citi-
(10) zenry
was considered essential to the
success
of the country’s republican form
of government
; virtue was to be instilled
not only by churches and schools, but
by families
, where the mother’s role
(15) was crucial
. Thus, according to Kerber,
motherhood became pivotal to the fate
of the republic
, providing justification for
an unprecedented attention to female
education
.

"LK說美革命後'RL媽'概念造成婦女教育機會增加"
"LK說領導者們希望婦女受教育以撫養有政治V的小孩"
"VC被認為對政府共合延續是必要滴"
"V不只被置入教堂跟學校,也進入’母親是關鍵’的家庭"
"因此LK說’母親’是共合命運的關鍵,且'母親’成為女性教育的端正"

第一段才五句話
功能是講LK的論述,未舉例

(20) Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography. Prior to Kerber’s work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work
is the notable exception. Examining
newspaper advertisements for acade-
mies
, Woody found that educational
opportunities
increased for both girls
and boys around 1750
. Pointing to “An
(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view
, Woody also claimed that
practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution
.
Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education
, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.

Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured
the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what
extent the Revolution really changed
women’s lives.


"論點的導入大改歷史"
"在LK之前教育歷史家幾乎未提到女人"
"TW的東東算是特例"
"藉研究報紙廣告,TW發現男女教育機會在1750年上升"
"TW在A作中也提到美革命前女性職訓有許多支持者"
"TW的證據挑戰’美革命’改變女性教育的態度"
"使得斷定’美革命真正改變女性人生的程度’這件事變的粉難"

第二段雖然七句話
可是有廢話
段落提到一個特例TW說早在美國革命前婦女教育機會就提升
並且最後兩句作者認為歷史學家把時間搞錯就是被LK害的
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-01-10 19:15

第12提問就女性教育歷史而言,LK跟TW主要哪裡不同
不用看選項
讀完文章自然就有答案

這兩隻差在對女性教育雞會提升的”起源時間點”不同
答案就是B
D是講十八世紀對女性教育機會提升的態度”是否有轉變”
必須要一個認為有轉
一個認為沒轉
才能選這個

可是這兩隻都認為有轉
只是LK認為是美革命前後
TW認為是1750左右
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

Re: [問題]GWD7-Q10~Q12

文章bugubugu » 2005-01-14 23:19

bugubugu \$m[1]:
Q10: (答案是B)
According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was

A. innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence
B. exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
C. unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices
D. controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys
E. atypical in that it examined the education of girls




今天再看了一次這題...
心理有個疑問....
E為何錯阿?
因為文章第22行開始說:

Prior to Kerber’s work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls
; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work is the notable exception.


那感覺是他是exception的原因在它有提到girl....
那為何E錯阿?
A~E只有E這答案有提到girl的概念耶....
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章micht » 2005-01-14 23:44

報告大家))

叮噹有去問徐老師這題
結果被徐老師唸了一下
說 "叮噹~你到底有沒有再唸書阿?"
"記得 這是閱讀 不是翻譯"

Q12 徐老師不認同B.
我困惑!!!
圖檔圖檔圖檔
頭像
micht
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3276
註冊時間: 2004-09-27 12:13

文章Behemoth » 2005-01-14 23:45

12題選b 理由同金剛跟我之前講過的
10題重點在prior to,所以選b,e錯在woody不是因為研究girl而特殊,是因為時間
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

下一頁

回到 GMAT Reading Comprehension 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 5 位訪客