Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]OG-Q227

[問題]OG-Q227

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG-Q227

文章bugubugu » 2005-01-03 20:39

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to
defendants so they can attempt to rebut
the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that thedefendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.
(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to
rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt
to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a
rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt
rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut


Answer to Question 227
In English the subjunctive mood is used to express a wish or requirement that a certain course of action be taken.
Such phrasing takes the form to wish [or] require that x be y, not that x should be y or that x is y. Choice B,
therefore, is best. In place of the subjunctive, A uses the indicative are and E uses an awkward gerund, making,
while C and D contain the unnecessary should. A and C also omit that after so, and D omits that after require.
The phrase attempt to rebut is more idiomatic than the phrases that replace it in C and D. Choices C and E
awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.


這裡指的

Choices C and E
awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.



我不太懂是哪一種錯誤....
可以請知道的人指點一下嗎?
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

Re: [問題]OG-Q227

文章 » 2005-01-03 20:52

bugubugu \$m[1]:Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to
defendants so they can attempt to rebut
the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that thedefendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.
(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to
rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt
to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a
rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt
rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut



這裡指的

Choices C and E
awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.



我不太懂是哪一種錯誤....
可以請知道的人指點一下嗎?


它說的就是典型的代名詞問題 , C / E 會有they 不知道要代誰的問題 ;)
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

Re: [問題]OG-Q227

文章bugubugu » 2005-01-03 21:05

魚 \$m[1]:
bugubugu \$m[1]:Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to
defendants so they can attempt to rebut
the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that thedefendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.
(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to
rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt
to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a
rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt
rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut



這裡指的

Choices C and E
awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.



我不太懂是哪一種錯誤....
可以請知道的人指點一下嗎?


它說的就是典型的代名詞問題 , C / E 會有they 不知道要代誰的問題 ;)



喔...
原來他是說they不知要指witnesses還是defendants阿....
瞭解了...
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章Jessy » 2005-01-12 15:39

我不懂其他選項為何就不會有they指代不清的問題

這題我是用require後面用原型動詞 -->刪除ACDE
爬文是一種美德....
Jessy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1033
註冊時間: 2004-11-07 11:52
來自: TPE

文章Pufa » 2005-01-12 22:55

Jessy \$m[1]:我不懂其他選項為何就不會有they指代不清的問題

這題我是用require後面用原型動詞 -->刪除ACDE


有沒有注意到ABD跟CE有什麼不同?
identities不能attempt to do something,只有defendants可以。
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-01-13 11:32

reguire三種用法
+of + N/Ving
指需要某物如何如何

+人+to+原V
要求某人去做某事

+that + 人(物) +(should省略) + 原V
要求人(物)應如何如何

CE that可能會指到witnesses
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

Re: [問題]OG-Q227

文章cg » 2005-08-02 14:14

我覺得這題真是OG中典型的指代問題
看到大家的討論更覺得SC真是一個玄妙的東西 :PP

正確選項(B)
Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that thedefendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

需要用邏輯去判斷 they-->指defendants 不是identities
因為只有人可以去attempt to rebut
不過很好奇 會不會有修飾witnesses的歧異呢?

但是在錯誤選項上
(C)that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a
rebuttal of
(E)making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut
Choices C and E
awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.

這個時候會有歧異 是因為so that 緊接witnesses所以會有降指代不清的情形嗎? 為什麼現在又不能用邏輯判斷了?

真是妙哉妙哉~~ 8-|
頭像
cg
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 72
註冊時間: 2004-10-28 01:04

文章Pufa » 2005-08-02 16:02

這又說到一個萬年考點:
so as to與so that。
so as to 後面跟的邏輯主語必須是主句主語。所以如果前後邏輯主語相同時就沒問題(往往是較簡單的句型) 。
so that後面的邏輯主語可以是主句主語,也可以不是主句主語。雖然如此,但要是主句裡除了主句主語之外還有兩個以上的名詞(像這題),就要小心判斷,當然修飾語離修飾對象越近越好。
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37

文章dibert8 » 2007-03-13 07:28

覺得ETS蠻強調平衡,因為OG的解釋裡動不動就祭出平衡. but 是對等連接詞,那更要平衡了,所以(E)可以先刪除. but 子句的句型是 require...that,當然前面要照辦,這樣就只有(B)會對了.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章dibert8 » 2007-03-13 07:41

有一個問題: so 可以當連接詞,意思是"所以", so that 用來表目的. 不知 so 跟 so that 有什麼差別? i.e. 如果把 (A) 的 are 改成 be 也對嗎? (that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut)
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章pimi » 2007-10-01 11:57

dibert8 \$m[1]:有一個問題: so 可以當連接詞,意思是"所以", so that 用來表目的. 不知 so 跟 so that 有什麼差別? i.e. 如果把 (A) 的 are 改成 be 也對嗎? (that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut)



看OG的解釋,在這題裡, 是必須用so that, 不能只用so, 所以即使A把are改成be, 還是不能選~~

不過OG並沒有解釋為何不能只用so, 不過我覺得因為有牽涉到平衡原則,
~ require that~, but ~ requires only that~
如果在中間插一個so~ 變成如下:
~ require that~so~, but ~ requires only that~
這樣就有點破壞了平衡了吧
所以還是只得用so that~~不能用so

大家覺得呢??
pimi
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 388
註冊時間: 2005-01-21 14:50

Re: [問題]OG-Q227

文章larry.tw » 2008-09-23 21:35

cg \$m[1]:我覺得這題真是OG中典型的指代問題

看到大家的討論更覺得SC真是一個玄妙的東西 :PP



正確選項(B)

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that thedefendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.



需要用邏輯去判斷 they-->指defendants 不是identities

因為只有人可以去attempt to rebut

不過很好奇 會不會有修飾witnesses的歧異呢?



但是在錯誤選項上

(C)that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a

rebuttal of

(E)making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

Choices C and E

awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.



這個時候會有歧異 是因為so that 緊接witnesses所以會有降指代不清的情形嗎? 為什麼現在又不能用邏輯判斷了?



真是妙哉妙哉~~ 8-|


我跟這位老兄有同樣的問題,請問各位大大
(B)選項 會不會有修飾witnesses的歧異呢?
larry.tw
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 155
註冊時間: 2007-01-10 16:45

Re: [問題]OG-Q227

文章dibert8 » 2008-09-25 10:22

代名詞指代原則: 1) 指代主詞, 2) 就近指代.
(C) (E) 的 they 就近指代 witnesses 句意不合理 (所以 awkward)
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

Re: [問題]OG-Q227

文章larry.tw » 2008-09-25 11:07

8-) 感謝di大回覆~~~

所以B選項
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut

判斷前面三個複數名詞時
identities: 邏輯錯誤(只有人可以去attempt to rebut),所以無法指代
witnesses: 根據代名詞指代原則: 1) 指代主詞, 2) 就近指代.,這個witness既不是主詞,也不是最近的,所以無法指代
defendants:符合"就近指代"原則,所以they就是指代defendants

請問這樣判斷沒錯吧??

另外,指代原則: 1) 指代主詞, 2) 就近指代 這是優先順序嗎?????
larry.tw
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 155
註冊時間: 2007-01-10 16:45

Re: [問題]OG-Q227

文章dibert8 » 2008-09-29 18:39

指代原則需依句意判斷. GMAT 考的是判斷力,要的是最好的選項,不要照表操課.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 6 位訪客