Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD0-03 (天山9-3)

GWD0-03 (天山9-3)

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD0-03 (天山9-3)

文章chunjuwu » 2005-01-16 20:27

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy.

Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses.

The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use executive titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a reason for considering that goal to be undesirable.

B. The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the second presents a reason against adopting that strategy.

C. The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal.

D. The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of that support.

E. The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the evidence offered against that belief.
chunjuwu
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 40
註冊時間: 2005-01-02 15:58

文章bugubugu » 2005-01-16 21:08

同學!
你題號又弄錯了....
這是GWD0-03...
或天山09-03...
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章homaru » 2005-01-16 21:25

感謝布榖
chunjuwu我幫你改標題嚕
下次請核對一下題號~
thanks
有一股蛋蛋的哀傷.....i98 i98
頭像
homaru
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 542
註冊時間: 2004-11-03 10:34
來自: 台北

文章bugubugu » 2005-01-16 21:31

首先第一句粗體字說公司會避免用title,用意是想降低階級的溝通....
然後說however轉折...(說明要用title的原因...)
第二句粗體字說用title可和外界打交道....
後面內容態度一致就不用去管它...

因此我BE決選...
我看到B有strategy和文章合...
就選B了...
不過我不知E哪裡不好就是了...
有人可再進一步解解E為何不對嗎?
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章agk99 » 2005-01-17 23:44

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy.
是講一個理由,講公司避免使用 title的理由

Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses.
講使用的好處

The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use executive titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.
代表作者支持用title

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a reason for considering that goal to be undesirable. 原題前後語不一致,這裡一致,錯

B. The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the second presents a reason against adopting that strategy. 正確

C. The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal. 語氣一致,又錯

D. The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of that support. 語氣一致,再錯

E. The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the evidence offered against that belief. 語氣還是一致
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章Behemoth » 2005-01-17 23:59

E錯在前半部沒有against,是有證據support才對
against是此句後半部才是against這個belief
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客