GWD5-39

網站 · 由 **agk99** » 2004-09-02 03:09

Q39:
In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.

A.a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing
B.a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing
C.a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written
D.which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing
E.which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written

本題答案B，你看厲害吧，有能人可以給解釋就最好啦
我是ABC 選一個，看你囉

由 **QQcandy** » 2004-09-04 22:55

我是用平衡法來取捨ABC的, (因是WHICH指代不清所以把DE去掉)

A : a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing

(because of 及 by the fact that...不平衡)

B : a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing

( not just by the fact that...及 but also by the fact that...平衡)

C : a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written

(not just because of drugs that...用that 帶出小子句, 但後面 but because of doctor having ....用分詞, 所以不平衡)

網站 · 由 **agk99** » 2004-09-10 20:07

謝謝糖，答案我接受
但我想附帶問一下
not only, but also , 可以省掉only嗎，我就是看沒有only所以不敢選b

由 **QQcandy** » 2004-09-11 00:30

agk99 \$m[1]:謝謝糖，答案我接受
但我想附帶問一下
not only, but also , 可以省掉only嗎，我就是看沒有only所以不敢選b

呵呵 ... 我覺的這題考的是 not A but B 耶....

我覺的 ets 是用 just and also 來渾淆我们吶 (6) ....

not only ...but (also)....只有 also 能省

not A but (rather) B....只有 rather 能省

網站 · 由 **agk99** » 2004-09-11 00:36

可是B有 also耶
還是這個also另有其他"任務"

由 **QQcandy** » 2004-09-11 01:01

agk99 \$m[1]:可是B有 also耶
還是這個also另有其他"任務"

hmm... 我覺得also的任務是和 just 平衡 .... :)

由魚 » 2004-09-11 01:17

怎辦這題我也很煩 ,

B 的 also 我到覺得還好因為 not just(副詞) A but also(副詞) 倒也平衡

跟QQ姐說的一樣 (Y)

但是, 大家都不會因為那個 the fact that 而猶疑嗎 (我的頭快爆炸啦...剛剛又分心去看了筆記 ,莫北北不是說the fact that 不選嗎 )

不過 C ...... ,a phenomenon occurring ......後面一連串都是用來修飾phenomenon <可以忽略>

就文法而言,後位修飾 =一個名詞 (a phenomenon )這樣是不是錯了 ???? 誰幫
我解答一下好嗎

謝謝 :'(

由 **QQcandy** » 2004-09-12 00:25

魚 \$m[1]:怎辦這題我也很煩 ,

B 的 also 我到覺得還好因為 not just(副詞) A but also(副詞) 倒也平衡

跟QQ姐說的一樣 (Y)

但是, 大家都不會因為那個 the fact that 而猶疑嗎 (我的頭快爆炸啦...剛剛又分心去看了筆記 ,莫北北不是說the fact that 不選嗎 )

不過 C ...... ,a phenomenon occurring ......後面一連串都是用來修飾phenomenon <可以忽略>

就文法而言,後位修飾 =一個名詞 (a phenomenon )這樣是不是錯了 ???? 誰幫
我解答一下好嗎

謝謝 :'(

莫老雖然說 the fact that 永遠不選, 但我覺的他說的意思應該是 the fact that 是贅字又囉唆之類的, 並不代表它在文法本質上是錯的, 所以在平衡的基楚上是可以被接受的....ㄟㄟㄟ...別忘了你在別的帖子上的啥舞粥至要的董事長的引言 ;)

網站 · 由 **agk99** » 2004-09-12 00:37

那麼改一下好了
the fact that少選

由魚 » 2004-09-12 01:00

QQcandy \$m[1]:
魚 \$m[1]:
不過 C ...... ,a phenomenon occurring ......後面一連串都是用來修飾phenomenon <可以忽略>

就文法而言,後位修飾 =一個名詞 (a phenomenon )這樣是不是錯了 ???? 誰幫
我解答一下好嗎
謝謝 :'(

莫老雖然說 the fact that 永遠不選, 但我覺的他說的意思應該是 the fact that 是贅字又囉唆之類的, 並不代表它在文法本質上是錯的, 所以在平衡的基楚上是可以被接受的....ㄟㄟㄟ...別忘了你在別的帖子上的啥舞粥至要的董事長的引言 ;)

GGJJ , 我還有問題沒問完 ,拜託拉我一把..紅色字

另外 , 今天乖乖找完大全 the fact that 全部 , 發現，考the fact that 累贅
只有 2題 , 而且都是 "順便錯" (都有其他明顯錯誤點)
但沒劃線部份 the fact that 出現的還蠻頻繁滴 ! 我決定揚棄此項規則 ,
大家自行參考嚕 ^^

由 **liwuu** » 2004-12-09 18:45

QQcandy \$m[1]:我是用平衡法來取捨ABC的, (因是WHICH指代不清所以把DE去掉)

A : a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing

(because of 及 by the fact that...不平衡)

B : a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing

( not just by the fact that...及 but also by the fact that...平衡)

C : a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written

(not just because of drugs that...用that 帶出小子句, 但後面 but because of doctor having ....用分詞, 所以不平衡)

我選c錯了,我想請問一下平衡要這麼工整嗎?因為我原本認為not just because of N....but because of N...就算平衡對稱了,連後面的形容詞子句也要這麼嚴謹嗎??然後一看到b中的but also,看到前面沒有not only就直接不選了...感覺這一題很老奸 :P

由 **bugubugu** » 2004-12-10 01:45

liwuu \$m[1]:
QQcandy \$m[1]:我是用平衡法來取捨ABC的, (因是WHICH指代不清所以把DE去掉)

A : a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing

(because of 及 by the fact that...不平衡)

B : a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing

( not just by the fact that...及 but also by the fact that...平衡)

C : a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written

(not just because of drugs that...用that 帶出小子句, 但後面 but because of doctor having ....用分詞, 所以不平衡)

我選c錯了,我想請問一下平衡要這麼工整嗎?因為我原本認為not just because of N....but because of N...就算平衡對稱了,連後面的形容詞子句也要這麼嚴謹嗎??然後一看到b中的but also,看到前面沒有not only就直接不選了...感覺這一題很老奸 :P

ㄜ...
我是用because of後面不要加Ving來刪c的...
不過我記得有一題gwd because of後面有加Ving...

網站 · 由 **agk99** » 2004-12-10 02:06

liwuu \$m[1]:
我選c錯了,我想請問一下平衡要這麼工整嗎?因為我原本認為not just because of N....but because of N...就算平衡對稱了,連後面的形容詞子句也要這麼嚴謹嗎??然後一看到b中的but also,看到前面沒有not only就直接不選了...感覺這一題很老奸 :P

你的問題就是我當初提這問題的情形
一模一樣

建議liwuu把 B C再各唸十次二十次，相信你會改選B 的

由 **liwuu** » 2004-12-10 17:42

agk99 \$m[1]:
你的問題就是我當初提這問題的情形
一模一樣

建議liwuu把 B C再各唸十次二十次，相信你會改選B 的

YA...雖然不知有沒有抓到你所謂多念幾遍的精神,不過感覺真的有差...
(c)選項念起來就是有點饒口...不知是不是agk99你的意思就是在這裡呢?!

由 **bestjavabean** » 2005-02-22 03:17

我記得because of N 表狀態
because S V 表動作所以這一題
because of doctors having also written 這穩錯... 因為write 是一個動作
所以不得已才選the fact that...吧...

GWD5-39

GWD5-39

誰在線上