Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]GWD3-29

[問題]GWD3-29

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]GWD3-29

文章migo0724 » 2005-01-21 17:21

Unlike the conviction held by many of her colleagues that genes were relatively simple and static, Barbara Mcclintock adhered to her own more complicated ideas about how henes might operate, and in 1983, at the age of 81, was awarded a Nobel Prixe for her discovery taht the henes in corn are capable fo moving from one chromosomal site to another.
(A)Unlike the conviction held by many of her colleagues that genes were
relatively simple and static,
(B)Although many of her colleagues were of the convictino of genes being
relatively simple and atatic
(C)Contrary to many of her colleagues being convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static
(D)Even though many of her colleagues were convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static
(E)Even with many of her collegues convinced of genes being relatively
simple and static
此題答案是(D)
我在做此題的時候,不選(A)是因為比較不同類的緣故而不選
而其他選項(B)(C)(E)都是因為出現being所以刪掉
但是我想要知道~除了being問題外,是否還有哪裡有問題~麻煩大家~謝謝~
migo0724
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 7
註冊時間: 2004-11-05 23:11

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-01-23 01:51

ㄣ..好像打錯一些字

being迷思在AT規則中是可以選的
除非結構不符才能刪
這題跟比較不同類關係不大
是句意題
現在的雞考大概將近一半考句意

主辭是後面BM這個人
動詞有兩個平衡
依附於...and被告知...
當然用看到Unlike可以用硬梆梆比來刪A
C可以比,但being錯在結構所以不選
應用關代子句
剩BDE

B後面那個being也是結構錯要用關代子句
兩個of造成雙向修飾且awkwand怪異
E也是變成being的整串副詞片語
應用子句言簡意駭

D即使她的同事相信...,BM仍依存於..且被告知...
符合原句意
用技巧可能會解不出來
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

文章Calvin » 2005-01-23 13:07

Let me try to translate the meaning of the sentence :

即使她很多同事都確信基因是相對地簡單穩定,BM仍堅持她自己關於基因較為複雜的運作理論,並於1983獲頒Nobel prize以表揚其…的發現!

choices BCE is awkward and convoluted.
D is concise and pretty clear.

FYI
有一些無聲的話語,只有尋夢的人,彼此才聽得懂
頭像
Calvin
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1155
註冊時間: 2004-12-28 02:46

文章pcl12 » 2005-02-03 22:00

不懂為何C應用關代子句...?
頭像
pcl12
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 103
註冊時間: 2004-12-03 19:26

文章jasonhsu » 2005-02-07 19:35

我A先刪, B寫得太囉唆, C文法不對,D很順,E一開頭就不對~~~~
jason
jasonhsu
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 87
註冊時間: 2005-01-10 15:32

文章pcl12 » 2005-02-07 23:40

請教一下,C的文法不對是。。?
that 子句接的位置怪怪的嗎?還是many of ..
頭像
pcl12
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 103
註冊時間: 2004-12-03 19:26

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-02-08 15:26

C
Contrary to many of her colleagues being convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static
小弟的意思是若把being改who were才會比較同類

因為要比是要比"人"
是要比B跟他的同事
若直接用Be動辭
會變成B跟整件事情比
文法結構謬誤
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-02-08 15:29

jasonhsu \$m[1]:我A先刪, B寫得太囉唆, C文法不對,D很順,E一開頭就不對~~~~


囉唆不一定錯ㄛ
要指出結構或句意哪裡錯及為何錯才行滴
有加入過大衛文教機構的童鞋都知道
Being會對
囉唆也會對
不平衡也會對
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

文章pcl12 » 2005-02-08 18:12

davidlee0222 \$m[1]:C
Contrary to many of her colleagues being convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static
小弟的意思是若把being改who were才會比較同類

因為要比是要比"人"
是要比B跟他的同事
若直接用Be動辭
會變成B跟整件事情比 <--怎麼說?看不大出來.... @@@
文法結構謬誤
頭像
pcl12
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 103
註冊時間: 2004-12-03 19:26

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-02-08 23:07

(C)Contrary to many of her colleagues being convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static

翻成中文看就很清楚
that後面是講convinced的內容是補述部分而非主軸
主辭是變成分辭的being整句話
many of her colleagues being convinced
與"很多她的同事深信基因相對簡單且靜態"不同
與"深信"不同,BMxxx如何如何
變成是"事"跟"人"比

(D)Even though many of her colleagues were convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static
這裡主辭是many of her colleagues
人跟人比才會對
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

文章cg » 2005-02-09 20:49

davidlee0222 \$m[1]:(C)Contrary to many of her colleagues being convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static

翻成中文看就很清楚
that後面是講convinced的內容是補述部分而非主軸
主辭是變成分辭的being整句話
many of her colleagues being convinced
與"很多她的同事深信基因相對簡單且靜態"不同
與"深信"不同,BMxxx如何如何
變成是"事"跟"人"比

(D)Even though many of her colleagues were convinced that genes were
relatively simple and static
這裡主辭是many of her colleagues
人跟人比才會對


大衛講的真好

我也來試著解釋一下
若是C會有兩種解釋
1. Contrary to 比較 many of her colleagues和 BM
2. Contrary to 比較 many of her colleagues being convinced that genes were relatively simple and static 和 BM
會造成模糊解釋的情況下 就不是好答案囉
頭像
cg
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 72
註冊時間: 2004-10-28 01:04

文章pcl12 » 2005-02-10 00:08

原來是這樣,現在懂了
其實C是在表現狀態,重心是相信怎樣怎樣的同事,
而不是在闡述兩派之間的看法(對一事情的看法-->動作)C確實使得同事相信的內容成了配角,重點是要表現對gene看法冋異的'內容'而不是'同事'
頭像
pcl12
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 103
註冊時間: 2004-12-03 19:26

文章cocaine » 2005-02-12 00:07

pcl12 \$m[1]:原來是這樣,現在懂了
其實C是在表現狀態,重心是相信怎樣怎樣的同事,
而不是在闡述兩派之間的看法(對一事情的看法-->動作)C確實使得同事相信的內容成了配角,重點是要表現對gene看法冋異的'內容'而不是'同事'


Barbara Mcclintock adhered to her own more complicated ideas about how henes might operate
從這句句意就可以知道Unlike要該句意相反意義的事情...
努力,才有甜蜜的果實
頭像
cocaine
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 502
註冊時間: 2004-12-23 23:53
來自: Mar

文章uioxcv » 2005-09-26 09:53

1



.




.
頭像
uioxcv
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 58
註冊時間: 2005-03-01 18:25

文章uioxcv » 2005-09-26 09:54

Contrary to A, B~~ 中 的A和B一定要同類嗎?
這題的選項(c)是否還有其他錯誤地方??
我怎麼記得莫老師在講解考古題P.90頁#5說過Contrary to對比不需同類耶?!

5.Contrary to popular belief, victors in the ancient Greek Olympic Games received cash prizes in addition to their laurel wreaths.
選項A正確答案 .
popular belief (非人) 與 victors (人) 不同類~~
頭像
uioxcv
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 58
註冊時間: 2005-03-01 18:25

下一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 5 位訪客