[問題]LSAT test 11-16

由 **shopcat** » 2005-01-31 00:02

16. George Bernard Shaw wrote: “That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity.”
Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?
(A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit
(B) Doctors who increase their profits by specializing only in diseases that affect a large percentage of the population
(C) Grocers who raise the price of food in order to increase their profit margins
(D) Oil companies that decrease the price of their oil in order to increase their market share
(E) Bakers and surgeons who earn a profit by supplying other peoples’ basic needs

真糟糕,連題目都不懂ㄌ
快救救我! ;''(

由 **micht** » 2005-01-31 00:22

付錢給麵包師父做麵包錢
同樣
付錢給surgeon動手術
A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit

Is this the answer?

由 **liwuu** » 2005-01-31 09:25

看半天...我猜E

ps.好奇問一下,shopcat是要考法學院嗎?!還是做CR補充練習而已...

由 **shopcat** » 2005-01-31 10:19

答案是A
為什麼是A呢??我還是不懂
我也是要考AT的啦,只是邏輯超差
所以最近在做邏輯的考古題
可是錯一堆只好跟站上的前輩請教...打擾囉

由 **liwuu** » 2005-01-31 10:23

micht請來指導一下吧... :|||

另外,LSAT的題目其實跟at的邏輯方向有點偏喔...
若看看對岸的大牛心得,有的人建議練習,有的人覺得太過偏反而抓不到at考試的重點
所以看你怎麼決定囉...

由 **shopcat** » 2005-01-31 10:31

其實這個題目是在南陽買的邏輯考古題
剛好有幾回跟LSAT重複這些題剛好是重複的
那怎麼辦, 我OG已經做三次ㄌ
板上的牛都說要統整起來
可是我的統整能力沒有很好
想說透過大量做題培養自己的感覺
那liwuu可以建議要如何唸邏輯ㄋ?謝謝囉

由 **odinhsu** » 2005-01-31 10:49

題目說的是付錢給醫生把你的腳鋸掉...會讓人對人性感到失望..
為什麼勒....
因為有些醫生會告訴你,你的病很嚴重要動大手術之類的
於是你花很多的錢給醫生賺...事實上那個手術根本不必要

這題讓我想到....之前好像有看到新聞說台灣有個鎮還是村的小地方
整個地方的婦女都沒有子宮....
因為她們有婦女病去看醫生時,醫生就告訴她們子宮有問題要摘除
所以她們統統沒有子宮....而醫生呢? 他可以支領高額的健保費.....

由 **shopcat** » 2005-01-31 10:59

天阿!!
這...這...這要如何才能想到這層涵義ㄋ?
我現在是了解為何選A
但是．．．這題目會不會太繞ㄌ...
這功力要如何練成ㄋ.. ;-S

由 **micht** » 2005-01-31 11:30

16. George Bernard Shaw wrote: “That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity.”

Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?

我的感覺是

付錢給麵包師父做麵包錢
同樣
付錢給surgeon動手術

買麵包吃付錢是為了獎賞麵包師父 for making such delicious bread for u (doing a favour for u)
但是不能和付錢給surgeon動手術相比
做手術不是因為喜歡動手術
giving a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg

誰會付錢請人把自己的腳給砍了 :|||

nonsense

(A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit

目的不在於賺錢
動手術 is not equal to 賺錢
做麵包 -->賺錢

由 **odinhsu** » 2005-01-31 12:51

"I don't know a single thoughtful and well-informed person who does not feel that the tragedy of illness at present is that it delievers your helplessly into the hands of a profession which you deeply mistrust."
這段話是接在題目那段話後面的
參考一下吧.....
全文請看
http://www.aameda.org/MemberServices/Ex ... eicher.pdf

不過LSAT的題目看看就算了....
CD上就算有人叫你做也一定會說最後要回歸OG
所以.....別太走火入魔

由 **Behemoth** » 2005-01-31 13:11

shopcat
這題...其實已經挺偏了喔
跟at考試方面不太一樣的~

由 **odinhsu** » 2005-01-31 14:02

同意B爺
我還沒看過有哪題AT的真題長的跟這題一樣的....

由 **shopcat** » 2005-01-31 15:01

謝謝你們的建議!
可以請教各位一個小問題
就是那除了OG以外我可以做什麼題目來提升自己的邏輯能力ㄋ?

由 **odinhsu** » 2005-01-31 15:42

OG做完了嗎?
如果還沒先做完它再說吧....
貪多嚼不爛...
切身之痛...

由 **shopcat** » 2005-01-31 15:55

我的OG已經做了兩次
答案都快背起來ㄌ
可是我的統整能力又不好
所以想說用作更多題目來培養感覺
是不是有其他題目可以做看看ㄋ?

[問題]LSAT test 11-16

[問題]LSAT test 11-16

誰在線上