Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - [問題]天山3-Q38

[問題]天山3-Q38

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]天山3-Q38

帖子twkevin » 2005-02-19 01:15

天山03-38:
The normative model of strategic decision-making suggests that executives examine a
firm’s external environment and internal conditions, and in using the set of objective
criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
on a strategy.

A. conditions, and in using the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
B. conditions, and they use the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses in deciding
C. conditions and, in using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, deciding
D. conditions and, using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, decide
E. conditions and, in their use of the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, they decide

答案是﹙D﹚

我想問的是 ,using ..., 那個插入語
我看CD有人是說修飾decide
有插入語修飾動辭嘛 ? 我是猶豫了A, D選了D 不過覺的很怪
头像
twkevin
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 326
注册: 2005-01-05 21:53

帖子Calvin » 2005-02-19 08:37

A is wrong since it puts a comma proceding " and ". If " and " connects the two actions referring the same subject, it cannot use comma.

With respect to participal " using ", it indeed modifies the verbal " decide ". It means 伴隨. There are a lot of similar examples in OG.

FYI
有一些無聲的話語,只有尋夢的人,彼此才聽得懂
头像
Calvin
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
帖子: 1155
注册: 2004-12-28 02:46

帖子agk99 » 2005-02-19 10:28

to twkevin
using...當然可以做修飾語,但事實上,插入語根本不必管他
不過更快的做法是,這一句是examine 與 decide的平衡
這就只能選D的啦
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
帖子: 3109
注册: 2004-08-24 22:12
地址: Shenzhen, China

Re: [問題]天山3-Q38

帖子twkevin » 2005-02-19 12:43

twkevin \$m[1]:天山03-38:
The normative model of strategic decision-making suggests that executives examine a
firm’s external environment and internal conditions, and in using the set of objective
criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
on a strategy.

A. conditions, and in using the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
B. conditions, and they use the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses in deciding
C. conditions and, in using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, deciding
D. conditions and, using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, decide
E. conditions and, in their use of the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, they decide

答案是﹙D﹚

我想問的是 ,using ..., 那個插入語
我看CD有人是說修飾decide
有插入語修飾動辭嘛 ? 我是猶豫了A, D選了D 不過覺的很怪


我想問的是插入語修飾名詞是很平常的
但插入語修飾動詞我到是沒見過


還是這句插入語executives + , using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses,
如果是這樣 那是說插入語可以不緊接在修飾的名詞後面嘛 ?

才疏學淺,有煩請指點
头像
twkevin
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 326
注册: 2005-01-05 21:53

Re: [問題]天山3-Q38

帖子davidlee0222 » 2005-02-19 12:46

twkevin \$m[1]:天山03-38:
The normative model of strategic decision-making suggests that executives examine a
firm’s external environment and internal conditions, and in using the set of objective
criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
on a strategy.

就像Calvin大牛說的
鬥號在and前沒有三個東西無法平衡
而因為對等連接詞and無法表達因果
所以這裡用分辭次要結構補述來補上因果關係
像AGK大大說的兩鬥號分辭補述當沒看到
因為那是次要結構

原句主軸是要講
N model指出經理人(用分析中的客觀標準)檢視內外在環境並決定策略


這裡光用主辭重複的結構錯誤就可以刪掉幾個


A. conditions, and in using the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide

and前鬥號無法平衡
後can decide無連接詞變流水句
且改變原句主軸


B. conditions, and they use the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses in deciding

and錯誤重複
主辭重複使結構謬誤
後面原本是主軸的decide變成補述
改變原句主軸


C. conditions and, in using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, deciding

decide原本要跟examine平衡
為兩同等重要的動作
卻變成分辭補述的次要結構
拿掉不影響主軸
使主軸意義改變
用in帶出的補述awkward
應該是要用by
但用分辭using就可以直接表達"藉由"


D. conditions and, using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, decide

兩鬥號分辭當沒看到
examine跟decide平衡
分辭補述因果連貫關係


E. conditions and, in their use of the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, they decide

they主辭重複結構錯誤
兩鬥號中用in帶出的補述awkward


答案是﹙D﹚

我想問的是 ,using ..., 那個插入語
我看CD有人是說修飾decide
有插入語修飾動辭嘛 ? 我是猶豫了A, D選了D 不過覺的很怪


and在鬥號前
後面分辭補數就在補述第二個洞辭

and在鬥號後
分辭補述就是在修飾第一個洞辭
可以看句意合不合
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 3017
注册: 2004-12-14 19:54

Re: [問題]天山3-Q38

帖子twkevin » 2005-02-19 15:52

twkevin \$m[1]:
twkevin \$m[1]:天山03-38:
The normative model of strategic decision-making suggests that executives examine a
firm’s external environment and internal conditions, and in using the set of objective
criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
on a strategy.

A. conditions, and in using the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide
B. conditions, and they use the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses in deciding
C. conditions and, in using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, deciding
D. conditions and, using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, decide
E. conditions and, in their use of the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, they decide

答案是﹙D﹚

我想問的是 ,using ..., 那個插入語
我看CD有人是說修飾decide
有插入語修飾動辭嘛 ? 我是猶豫了A, D選了D 不過覺的很怪


我想問的是插入語修飾名詞是很平常的
但插入語修飾動詞我到是沒見過


還是這句插入語executives + , using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses,
如果是這樣 那是說插入語可以不緊接在修飾的名詞後面嘛 ?

才疏學淺,有煩請指點


原句主軸是要講
N model指出經理人(用分析中的客觀標準)檢視內外在環境並決定策略
所以是這句插入語修飾executives?

? 如果是這樣 那是說插入語可以不緊接在修飾的名詞後面嘛 ?
头像
twkevin
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 326
注册: 2005-01-05 21:53

帖子Behemoth » 2005-02-21 16:22

using....為插入語修飾executives
and兩邊主詞相同省略
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
头像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
帖子: 2948
注册: 2004-09-10 18:19
地址: Boston

帖子reohuang » 2005-02-21 16:46

Calvin \$m[1]:

With respect to participal " using ", it indeed modifies the verbal " decide ". It means 伴隨. There are a lot of similar examples in OG.

FYI


我也以為using是用來modify the verb "decide"比較合邏輯喔~
头像
reohuang
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 305
注册: 2004-11-23 01:44

帖子Behemoth » 2005-02-21 17:13

如果using用來修飾decide
會有因果倒置的問題

分詞表伴隨是用來表示原型動詞此一動作引起分詞此一伴隨動作
如此一來
此句就變成decide後才有using的概念
前後因果相反

我上面所謂省略相同主詞executives是省略在decide前面
所以using仍是修飾executives沒問題
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
头像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
帖子: 2948
注册: 2004-09-10 18:19
地址: Boston


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 10 位游客

cron