不曉得是不是因為考古題不重要？
或是因為ETS出題題型或方向改變，已經沒有參考價值了呢？
還是說 那對大家來說都太簡單了呀？
總之，我還是斗膽地要請教大大們
因為，MIKELEE站長大大太忙 都不回我的私人訊息
我現在在補美加黃冠文的CR 因為都是在翻譯
所以 對於整個邏輯架構實在是非常弱
之前看了站上分享的決戰邏輯之分類突破
因為沒有慧根 所以很多專業字彙都不是很了
例如：架橋樑 指的是A->B, B->C =>A=>C嗎？....
唉∼∼跟大家程度實在差太多了....
竟然可以分析題型 和教解題技巧
所以，請大家教一下
考古第一回第7題：
In any negotiations between a party with limited aims and an opposing party with unlimited aims, the party with limited aims is bound to lose. This is so because the scope of a negotiating party's aims determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party.
Which of following is an assumption implicit in the passage above?
(A) The intensity with which parties conduct negotiation affects the outcome of those negotiations.
(B) Negotiations almost always pit against one another parties whose aims differ in scope.
(C) The outcome of negotiations cannot be correctly predicted in advance.
(D) A negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing.
(E) Negotiating parties are typically not aware of the scope of each other's aims until the cotcome is no longer in doubt.
大家是怎麼選到A的？邏輯推導過程為何？D又是哪裡錯？
對不起，一次好像問了好多問題.....
P.S. 再加一小問題： 明明打的時候，每一行最後一個字都是完整的
貼上之後救被切割了耶 降...大家會比較不好閱讀說
