Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - OG-49

OG-49

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

OG-49

文章QQcandy » 2004-10-15 22:14

各位, 我有一題問題關於 OG 的....

49. The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet.

(A) which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting

(B) doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known to orbit

(C) which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known in orbit around

(D) doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting

(E) which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known that orbit

The pronoun which should be used to refer to a previously mentioned noun, not to the idea expressed in an entire clause. In A, C, and E, which seems to refer to a vague concept involving the detection of moons, but there is no specific noun, such as detection, to which it can refer. Also in E, the use of the phrasing the number... now known that orbit is ungrammatical and unclear. B and D use the correct participial form, doubling, to modify the preceding clause, but D, like A, uses known as orbiting rather than known to orbit, a phrase that is more idiomatic in context. B, therefore, is the best answer.


我有好多問題, 尤其是 OG 解飾看不懂 

1. 解釋說 which 應代一個名詞不是代一個句子中觀念, 是說它不能代整個句子嗎 ? 還是是說只是不能代抽象的概念 ?

2. answer A, C, E 中, 他說 which 指代不清楚, 那為啥answer B and D 中的 doubling 會修釋整個句子 ??? 怎麼判斷呢 ??? 而且我記的 莫北北說依句意, which 是修釋 moons 那 doubling 應該也修飾 moons 呀  *-)

3. 就句子的結構說, 為甚麼 small 及 previously 中間加逗號呢 ? isn't it "six small, previously unseen moons" 是一個 adj + N 的結構. 有人說 "previously unseen moons circling Uranus" 是插入句  :o  ???

+o( +o( +o( 我快瘋了 
頭像
QQcandy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1298
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:05

文章bear » 2004-10-15 22:23

1.which 本來就不能代整個句子阿 .... 若要指代前面一整句所說的東東, 要用分詞

我記得OG有一題什麼 給statue上口紅的那道題也是這種題型....
頭像
bear
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 962
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12

文章 » 2004-10-16 16:35

QQcandy \$m[1]:各位, 我有一題問題關於 OG 的....

3. 就句子的結構說, 為甚麼 small 及 previously 中間加逗號呢 ? isn't it "six small, previously unseen moons" 是一個 adj + N 的結構. 有人說 "previously unseen moons circling Uranus" 是插入句  :o  ???

+o( +o( +o( 我快瘋了 


3. 不加 , previously 就會有雙向修飾的危機 , 加了, 之後previously很清楚修飾對象為unseen

QQ姐 , 下列的回答 沒依照您的提問順序 請自己檢著看吧

1.按照句意,which 是該修飾moons的,不過

The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet.

which 會被搞混以為是指代Uranus對吧 ^^

至於 doubling 修飾的對象是moons 跟 整句

文法都是正確的

但是句意上的差別

dobling~修飾moons時 句意跟which 指代moons相同

不過 這樣就沒有辦法完整的表示 The cameras of the Voyager II偵測到

顆變 12顆 的整個狀態

而只是 The cameras of the Voyager II 偵測到那6顆並且那六顆會變成12顆 (這樣又會出現時態的問題)

以上是魚 截至目前為止的理解 供QQ 姐 參考 ;)

若有誤 煩請指正 ^^ 3Q
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章QQcandy » 2004-10-16 23:27

bear \$m[1]:1.which 本來就不能代整個句子阿 .... 若要指代前面一整句所說的東東, 要用分詞

我記得OG有一題什麼 給statue上口紅的那道題也是這種題型....


嗯, 對, OG 都是這麼說的, 可是不要忘記那題 monfish 還沒有結論呢  *-)

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=463
頭像
QQcandy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1298
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:05

文章QQcandy » 2004-10-16 23:58

魚 \$m[1]:
QQcandy \$m[1]:各位, 我有一題問題關於 OG 的....

3. 就句子的結構說, 為甚麼 small 及 previously 中間加逗號呢 ? isn't it "six small, previously unseen moons" 是一個 adj + N 的結構. 有人說 "previously unseen moons circling Uranus" 是插入句  :o  ???

+o( +o( +o( 我快瘋了 


3. 不加 , previously 就會有雙向修飾的危機 , 加了, 之後previously很清楚修飾對象為unseen

QQ姐 , 下列的回答 沒依照您的提問順序 請自己檢著看吧

1.按照句意,which 是該修飾moons的,不過

The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet.

which 會被搞混以為是指代Uranus對吧 ^^

至於 doubling 修飾的對象是moons 跟 整句

文法都是正確的

但是句意上的差別

dobling~修飾moons時 句意跟which 指代moons相同

不過 這樣就沒有辦法完整的表示 The cameras of the Voyager II偵測到

顆變 12顆 的整個狀態

而只是 The cameras of the Voyager II 偵測到那6顆並且那六顆會變成12顆 (這樣又會出現時態的問題)

以上是魚 截至目前為止的理解 供QQ 姐 參考 ;)

若有誤 煩請指正 ^^ 3Q


嗯 ~ 謝謝魚MM, 我再好好的研究研究, ㄟ 我們那個 monfish 最後有結論嗎 ?? 我不記得了 :p
頭像
QQcandy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1298
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:05

文章chenyi826 » 2006-07-26 19:30

...,which是可以修飾前面整句的。止步過修辭上都用It另起一句。只剩下BD選項。
be known to..VR
be known as..N 似乎較合乎邏輯。
chenyi826
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 18
註冊時間: 2006-07-25 16:58
來自: Kaohsiung City

文章evelyn_yeh » 2006-07-27 00:01

結論就是,唸完句子時,就要知道"double"這個動作的主詞是誰,一切就迎刃而解了
愛 原來是沒有名字的
在相遇之前
等待就是她的名字
頭像
evelyn_yeh
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 193
註冊時間: 2006-03-15 22:36
來自: 台北


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 14 位訪客