Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD-3-Q2

GWD-3-Q2

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD-3-Q2

文章iamdior » 2005-01-05 23:29

A
Q2:
Hunter: Hunters alone are blamed for the decline in Greenrock National Forest’s deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest’s protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

In the hunter’s argument, the boldface portion plays which of the following roles?

A.It is the main conclusion of the argument.
B.It is an objection that has been raised against the main conclusion of the argument.
C.It is a judgment that the argument opposes.
D.It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.
E.It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.


請問答案B為何不行呢 ?
這篇的conclusion為何不是第一句.然後黑體字的部分反駁他

謝謝~
iamdior
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 168
註冊時間: 2004-11-25 13:13

文章Behemoth » 2005-01-05 23:33

因為also此字

使得他並沒有完全的反駁他上一句
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

文章Jessy » 2005-01-05 23:38

這整段話都是hunter講的...
黑體字才算是整段的conclusion
尤其在黑體字後面整個都是在為黑體字作舉例解釋
爬文是一種美德....
Jessy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1033
註冊時間: 2004-11-07 11:52
來自: TPE

文章iamdior » 2005-01-05 23:40

原來是醬子阿..哇塞你超細心的耶~~
所以可以說..第一句是結論.黑體字是"main"結論

降子對嗎?

感謝~
iamdior
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 168
註冊時間: 2004-11-25 13:13

文章Jessy » 2005-01-05 23:51

我不知道你所說的結論跟main結論有何不同
第一句在這邊比較像個'楔子'

比如這樣說,第一銷售部業績下滑10%
第一銷售部經理說: 公司今年整體銷售額下滑10%, 可是,第二銷售部的業績下滑50%,尤其他們對xxx商品的推展不力..........

p.s.別罵我,我知道舉例很爛......
:P
爬文是一種美德....
Jessy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1033
註冊時間: 2004-11-07 11:52
來自: TPE

文章iamdior » 2005-01-06 00:07

多謝多謝 我懂了..
10%只是引言..50%才是經理不爽的重點!

多謝你阿..
這舉例很棒ㄚ..我常被罵所以很了解
iamdior
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 168
註冊時間: 2004-11-25 13:13

GWD3-2

文章colorr » 2005-03-13 21:07

Hunter: Hunters alone are blamed for the decline in Greenrock National Forest’s deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest’s protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

In the hunter’s argument, the boldface portion plays which of the following roles?

A.It is the main conclusion of the argument.

B.It is an objection that has been raised against the main conclusion of the argument.

C.It is a judgment that the argument opposes.

D.It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.

E.It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.


請問為什麼不能選D呢? i60
colorr
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 19
註冊時間: 2004-10-28 09:43

文章liwuu » 2005-03-13 22:02

題目問這句話在hunter的論述中,扮演何種角色?!
試假設今天若你身為hunter,說這整段話最主要應該是想為自己辯駁(鹿的數量下降不全都是我殺的啦...), 其中粗體部分為conclusion(黑熊也是共犯啦...)
所以argument重點並非去解釋為什麼黑熊同樣也扮演殺手角色...
夫妻同心,其利斷金...Magical Mr. MISTOFFELEES
昂首千丘遠,嘯傲風間;堪尋敵手共論劍,高處不勝寒
頭像
liwuu
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 1639
註冊時間: 2004-11-17 06:02

文章colorr » 2005-03-13 23:01

liwuu \$m[1]:題目問這句話在hunter的論述中,扮演何種角色?!
試假設今天若你身為hunter,說這整段話最主要應該是想為自己辯駁(鹿的數量下降不全都是我殺的啦...), 其中粗體部分為conclusion(黑熊也是共犯啦...)
所以argument重點並非去解釋為什麼黑熊同樣也扮演殺手角色...


大謝
豁然開朗阿 i54
colorr
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 19
註冊時間: 2004-10-28 09:43

文章faithful » 2005-09-07 20:04

此題我亦在(A)、(D)間徘徊,終於找到一種解決方式,提出來供大家參考。
Hunter: Hunters alone are blamed for the decline in Greenrock National Forest’s deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest’s protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

In the hunter’s argument, the boldface portion plays which of the following roles?

A. It is the main conclusion of the argument.
B. It is an objection that has been raised against the main conclusion of the argument.
C. It is a judgment that the argument opposes.
D. It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain. <--獵人並非嘗試著去解釋一個發現,因為他說明顯的 (clearly),所以已然下結論。
E. It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.

最後,選(A)。
faithful
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 51
註冊時間: 2005-08-05 10:51
來自: Taipei, Taiwan

文章Miranda's » 2005-11-21 16:55

liwuu \$m[1]:題目問這句話在hunter的論述中,扮演何種角色?!
試假設今天若你身為hunter,說這整段話最主要應該是想為自己辯駁(鹿的數量下降不全都是我殺的啦...), 其中粗體部分為conclusion(黑熊也是共犯啦...)
所以argument重點並非去解釋為什麼黑熊同樣也扮演殺手角色...

sorry,可否再解釋清楚一些呢? 還是覺得ad沒不一樣... 3Q^^
頭像
Miranda's
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 49
註冊時間: 2005-10-07 20:13

文章fiona » 2005-11-22 00:07

我覺得D的FINDING比較有爭議
題目沒有說明有一個新的發現
而整句話的意思就是獵人在找別的藉口來說人不是我殺的~
所以我覺得A比較正確
FYI
頭像
fiona
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 344
註冊時間: 2005-05-27 08:36


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 4 位訪客

cron