大全-sec14-02

[best555tw]

2. The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word “natural” to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.
(A) or nothing that has been
(B) or that has been
(C) and nothing that is
(D) or anything that has been
(E) and anything

請問
為什麼不用and
這些都不包含的才叫做nature
or不是說其中一項嗎

[Pufa]

大全713
註釋說的蠻仔細的：
Choices A, B, and C are faulty because the not in do not contain makes the negatives nothing and nor unidiomatic.
In E, and fails to indicate that anything… is an all-inclusive term, not another separate item in the list additives,…preservatives….

這是舊版OG的題目跟註釋。
大家討論討論。

[best555tw]

腦筋打結了
能不能用中文解釋一次

[cocaine]

我翻譯後半句.

題目說 "天然"食物是不能有色素,防腐劑,以及合成的任何物質.

因為前面有don't 否定字眼了,後面用nothing 變成負負成正. 變成包含有合成物質
句意不對.

[best555tw]

能否解釋一下E的and哪裡不對
頭腦一直轉不過來.......

[DARY]

能否解釋一下E的and哪裡不對
頭腦一直轉不過來.......

簡單的說
肯定句的平衡用"and"
否定句的平衡用"or"

實際上，有一點邏輯的關係
肯的的話=>都要對才能成立=>用"and"
否定的話=>其中一個錯就錯了=>用"or"

[best555tw]

thanks


大全上寫ｆａｉｒｌｙ　ｅａｓｙ
但從句意看
我卻覺得ｅｘｔｒｅｍｅｌｙ　ｈａｒｄ