[問題]gwd-24-38

[nana]

24-38 In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.
A) leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of
B) with its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
C) and its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting
D) while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of
E) so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting

這題答案是C
我覺得怎麼看就怎麼怪耶

[Pufa]

24-38 In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.
A) leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of
B) with its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
C) and its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting
D) while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of
E) so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting

這題答案是C
我覺得怎麼看就怎麼怪耶

這題我去CD看了一下
他們說這很有可能是當時key題目的同志一時手誤，才會有這種怪胎句。

[訪客]

NaNa同學,貼題目最好也把線標一下
這樣要讓要回答的人還要多花時間找東找西地
方便大家ㄇㄟ

這題我覺得不會很奇怪阿
那個用分詞polluting~修飾前面整各狀況
這在OG很長出現
這題我個人認為在考你必須把邏輯關係搞清楚
其他選項錯誤都很明顯
A的leaking可能修飾先面那個名詞,這不通吧
B and D的it指整各漏油事件,這犯了ETS大忌
E,so that 表目的,這劃線應該是要表因果才對

請指教

[Pufa]

NaNa同學,貼題目最好也把線標一下
這樣要讓要回答的人還要多花時間找東找西地
方便大家ㄇㄟ

這題我覺得不會很奇怪阿
那個用分詞polluting~修飾前面整各狀況
這在OG很長出現
這題我個人認為在考你必須把邏輯關係搞清楚
其他選項錯誤都很明顯
A的leaking可能修飾先面那個名詞,這不通吧
B and D的it指整各漏油事件,這犯了ETS大忌
E,so that 表目的,這劃線應該是要表因果才對

請指教

他們的意思是its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons這小段話是打錯的。
就像霹靂遊俠講的，其他選項都有致命的錯誤，所以只好姑且認為C是當時熱心的鍵盤手一時手誤。

[liwuu]

嗯...應該是多打"its cargo of"一遍
(c)and its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting
改成and its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting就不怪囉

[nana]

謝謝大大們指點~~~

我下次會注意要標線啦 :-$

[lijen0711]

救我拿到的版本
BC兩選項的 its cargo of都是被誤打的
也就是原題目是沒有 重複its cargo of
所以答案是C是沒有問題的

[evelight]

AD:出現while的位置不對，造成句意荒謬
E: they代替gallons, 句意荒謬
C比B好，用分詞表達因果關係比用and並列更精確，選C

[pimi]

不太懂用分詞代表因果關西這句話耶 有人可以救救我嗎????

[keane0727]

分詞構句可以表因果，如
badly injured, she couldn't walk.

但這裡C我不覺得是表因果，應該是表伴隨狀況

[yvetteliao]

24-38 In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.
A) leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of
B) with its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
C) and its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting
D) while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of
E) so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting


這一題之前的mikelee大大提到說B與D的it指整個漏油事件，但是我覺得可能是it優先指代原主詞barge，因此造成句意錯誤。
因為在D選項中的it應當是指barge才會有leaked的動作。
這是我的一點想法，請大家指正討論。

[hey]

整句應是In January 1994 an oil barge ran around off the coast of San Jan, Puerto Rico, and it's cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean and polluted the city's beaches.
而將其and刪掉及polluted改成分詞結構且前面加上逗號, 因此句子就變成(C)這個選項了