[問題]大全1-15

[shena]

Technological education is worsening. People between eighteen and twenty-four, who are just emerging from their formal education, are more likely to be technologically illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, issues for public referenda will increasingly involve aspects of technology.
Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

(A) If all young people are to make informed decisions on public referenda, many of them must learn more about technology.
(B) Thorough studies of technological issues and innovations should be made a required part of the public and private school curriculum.
(C) It should be suggested that prospective voters attend applied science courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in technical matters.
(D) If young people are not to be overly influenced by famous technocrats, they must increase their knowledge of pure science.
(E) On public referenda issues, young people tend to confuse real or probable technologies with impossible ideals.

ANS:(A)

這一題看完霧煞煞~

[liwuu]

這一題我的看法為目前有關技術教育越來越差,18~24歲的人相較於較大的成年人,有如技術文盲一樣,然而公投issue卻逐漸增加技術觀點

問可以得到何種結論?!

選項A,如果所有年輕人想針對公投議題做出比較清楚地決定,他們必須加強有關技術方面的知識(意即表示起碼要把公投議題搞懂,才能做出informed decision,不然就是管他寫什麼,反正選黨就對了...林貢安ㄋㄟ對不對啊?!)

[shena]

丟~哇災啦!!甘溫~

[dibert8]

這題用削去法做的:
(E) 題目沒有 real or probable technologies
(D) 題目沒有 pure science
(C) voters 有老有少
(D) 不是問教育政策
=> (A) 族群: young people, 主題: public referenda, 作為: learn technology (以解決他們 technologically illiterate 的問題)