[問題] 天山03-23

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題] 天山03-23

文章ginalee6 » 2005-05-24 21:48

Q23:
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land,provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

我選C,答案D
:^)
頭像
ginalee6
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 29
註冊時間: 2005-01-24 19:33

文章汪汪北鼻 » 2005-05-24 21:55

這一題出現了好幾次了 :smile

C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
沒說能達到,也沒反駁結論

D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
評估goal的可能性,提出支持該strategy的基礎立場->正確
:smile
感謝scujean, Ace 無私轉貼Math JJ
頭像
汪汪北鼻
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 392
註冊時間: 2004-10-30 00:52
來自: Taipei


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 2 位訪客