Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]天山03-35,36

[問題]天山03-35,36

GMAT 考的是閱讀....閱讀....還是閱讀....

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]天山03-35,36

文章meimie » 2005-06-02 13:27

(This passage is excerpted from material
published in 1997.)
Whereas United States economic
productivity grew at an annual
rate of 3 percent from 1945 to 1965,
it has grown at an annual rate of
(5) only about 1 percent since the early
1970’s. What might be preventing
higher productivity growth? Clearly,
the manufacturing sector of the
economy cannot be blamed. Since
(10) 1980, productivity improvements
in manufacturing have moved the
United States from a position of
acute decline in manufacturing
to one of world prominence.
(15) Manufacturing, however, constitutes
a relatively small proportion
of the economy. In 1992, goodsproducing
businesses employed
only 19.1 percent of American
(20) workers, whereas service-producing
businesses employed 70 percent.
Although the service sector has
grown since the late 1970’s, its
productivity growth has declined.
(25) Several explanations have been
offered for this decline and for the
discrepancy in productivity growth
between the manufacturing and
service sectors. One is that tra-
(30) ditional measures fail to reflect
service-sector productivity growth
because it has been concentrated
in improved quality of services.
Yet traditional measures of manu-
(35) facturing productivity have shown
significant increases despite the
undermeasurement of quality,
whereas service productivity has
continued to stagnate. Others argue
(40) that since the 1970’s, manufacturing
workers, faced with strong foreign
competition, have learned to work
more efficiently in order to keep their
jobs in the United States, but service
(45) workers, who are typically under
less global competitive pressure,
have not. However, the pressure on
manufacturing workers in the United
States to work more efficiently has
(50) generally been overstated, often
for political reasons. In fact, while
some manufacturing jobs have been
lost due to foreign competition, many
more have been lost simply because
(55) of slow growth in demand for manufactured
goods.
Yet another explanation blames
the federal budget deficit: if it were
lower, interest rates would be lower
(60) too, thereby increasing investment
in the development of new technologies,
which would spur productivity
growth in the service sector. There
is, however, no dearth of techno-
(65) logical resources; rather, managers
in the service sector fail to take
advantage of widely available skills
and machines. High productivity
growth levels attained by leading-
(70) edge service companies indicate
that service-sector managers
who wisely implement available
technology and choose skillful
workers can significantly improve
(75) their companies’ productivity.
The culprits for service-sector
productivity stagnation are the
forces—such as corporate
takeovers and unnecessary
(80) governmental regulation—that
distract managers from the task
of making optimal use of available
resources.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q35:
It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following was true of the United
States manufacturing sector in the years immediately prior to 1980?
A. It was performing relatively poorly.
B. It was in a position of world prominence.
C. It was increasing its productivity at an annual rate of 3 percent.
D. It was increasing its productivity at an annual rate of 1 percent.
E. Its level of productivity was higher than afterward.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q36:
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following
statements about productivity improvements in United States service companies?
A. Such improvements would be largely attributable to efficiencies resulting from
corporate takeovers.
B. Such improvements would depend more on wise implementation of technology
than on mangers’ choice of skilled workers.
C. Such improvements would be more easily accomplished if there were fewer
governmental regulations of the service sector.
D. Such improvements would require companies to invest heavily in the
development of new technologies.
E. Such improvements would be attributable primarily to companies’ facing global
competitive pressure.


35題答案是A, 我選D,
第4-6行: it has grown at an annual rate of only about 1 percent since the early 1970’s.
意思不是D嗎? *-)

36題答案是C, 我選B, 為什麼呢?
頭像
meimie
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 30
註冊時間: 2005-01-09 18:08

文章汪汪北鼻 » 2005-06-02 14:45

What might be preventing
higher productivity growth? Clearly,
the manufacturing sector of the
economy cannot be blamed. Since
(10) 1980, productivity improvements
in manufacturing have moved the
United States from a position of
acute decline in manufacturing
to one of world prominence.


1980年後由decline一躍而成one of world prominence,意指之前表示很差

Q35:
It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following was true of the United States manufacturing sector in the years immediately prior to 1980? 題目是問immediately在1980年前,有對比的意味
A. It was performing relatively poorly. (正確)因為1980年後就一躍而成one of world prominence

D. It was increasing its productivity at an annual rate of 1 percent.
Whereas United States economic
productivity grew at an annual
rate of 3 percent from 1945 to 1965,
it has grown at an annual rate of
(5) only about 1 percent since the early
1970’s

這並沒有一個對比的狀態,從1970年成長就為1,那1980也是1了,
感謝scujean, Ace 無私轉貼Math JJ
頭像
汪汪北鼻
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 392
註冊時間: 2004-10-30 00:52
來自: Taipei

文章汪汪北鼻 » 2005-06-02 14:47

Q36:
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following
statements about productivity improvements in United States service companies?

C. Such improvements would be more easily accomplished if there were fewer governmental regulations of the service sector.

The culprits for service-sector
productivity stagnation are the
forces—such as corporate
takeovers and unnecessary
(80) governmental regulation
—that
distract managers from the task
of making optimal use of available
resources.
感謝scujean, Ace 無私轉貼Math JJ
頭像
汪汪北鼻
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 392
註冊時間: 2004-10-30 00:52
來自: Taipei

文章汪汪北鼻 » 2005-06-02 14:47

又多按一次 :sad
感謝scujean, Ace 無私轉貼Math JJ
頭像
汪汪北鼻
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 392
註冊時間: 2004-10-30 00:52
來自: Taipei

文章Janet » 2005-11-10 18:01

我的問題在第三段的判讀(尤其是藍色部分那句功能是什麼?)

Yet another explanation blames
the federal budget deficit: if it were
lower, interest rates would be lower
(60) too, thereby increasing investment
in the development of new technologies,
which would spur productivity
growth in the service sector. There
is, however, no dearth of techno-
(65) logical resources; rather, managers
in the service sector fail to take
advantage of widely available skills
and machines.
High productivity
growth levels attained by leading-
(70) edge service companies indicate
that service-sector managers
who wisely implement available
technology and choose skillful
workers can significantly improve
(75) their companies’ productivity.
The culprits for service-sector
productivity stagnation are the
forces—such as corporate
takeovers and unnecessary
(80) governmental regulation—that
distract managers from the task
of making optimal use of available
resources.
------------------------

問題33.Q33:
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the budget-deficit explanation for the
discrepancy mentioned in line 27?
A. Research shows that the federal budget deficit has traditionally caused service
companies to invest less money in research and development of new technologies.
B. New technologies have been shown to play a significant role in companies that
have been able to increase their service productivity.
C. In both the service sector and manufacturing, productivity improvements are
concentrated in gains in quality.
D. The service sector typically requires larger investments in new technology in
order to maintain productivity growth than dose manufacturing.
E. High interest rates tend to slow the growth of manufacturing productivity as much
as they slow the growth of service-sector productivity in the United States.
Answer:E

請問本題的解題思路,因為第三段我看不是很懂作者主要的闡述!
熱情優雅百分百的Janet
Janet
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 136
註冊時間: 2005-08-04 21:50

文章modern » 2005-11-14 01:04

Janet \$m[1]:我的問題在第三段的判讀(尤其是藍色部分那句功能是什麼?)

Yet another explanation blames
the federal budget deficit: if it were
lower, interest rates would be lower
(60) too, thereby increasing investment
in the development of new technologies,
which would spur productivity
growth in the service sector. There
is, however, no dearth of techno-
(65) logical resources; rather, managers
in the service sector fail to take
advantage of widely available skills
and machines.
High productivity
growth levels attained by leading-
(70) edge service companies indicate
that service-sector managers
who wisely implement available
technology and choose skillful
workers can significantly improve
(75) their companies’ productivity.
The culprits for service-sector
productivity stagnation are the
forces—such as corporate
takeovers and unnecessary
(80) governmental regulation—that
distract managers from the task
of making optimal use of available
resources.
------------------------

問題33.Q33:
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the budget-deficit explanation for the
discrepancy mentioned in line 27?
A. Research shows that the federal budget deficit has traditionally caused service
companies to invest less money in research and development of new technologies.
B. New technologies have been shown to play a significant role in companies that
have been able to increase their service productivity.
C. In both the service sector and manufacturing, productivity improvements are
concentrated in gains in quality.
D. The service sector typically requires larger investments in new technology in
order to maintain productivity growth than dose manufacturing.
E. High interest rates tend to slow the growth of manufacturing productivity as much
as they slow the growth of service-sector productivity in the United States.
Answer:E

請問本題的解題思路,因為第三段我看不是很懂作者主要的闡述!


http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopi ... et+deficit

善用搜尋喔 :)
Morden Chen |CUHK MBA Class of 2008

Http://apply4mba.blogspot.com
MBA人的blog重新開張,免費諮詢,請來賞光
頭像
modern
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1319
註冊時間: 2005-10-19 23:31
來自: Microsoft China

文章hcgh » 2006-10-05 09:18

Janet \$m[1]:我的問題在第三段的判讀(尤其是藍色部分那句功能是什麼?)

Yet another explanation blames
the federal budget deficit: if it were
lower, interest rates would be lower
(60) too, thereby increasing investment
in the development of new technologies,
which would spur productivity
growth in the service sector. There
is, however, no dearth of techno-
(65) logical resources; rather, managers
in the service sector fail to take
advantage of widely available skills
and machines.
High productivity
growth levels attained by leading-
(70) edge service companies indicate
that service-sector managers
who wisely implement available
technology and choose skillful
workers can significantly improve
(75) their companies’ productivity.
The culprits for service-sector
productivity stagnation are the
forces—such as corporate
takeovers and unnecessary
(80) governmental regulation—that
distract managers from the task
of making optimal use of available
resources.
------------------------

問題33.Q33:
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the budget-deficit explanation for the
discrepancy mentioned in line 27?
A. Research shows that the federal budget deficit has traditionally caused service
companies to invest less money in research and development of new technologies.
B. New technologies have been shown to play a significant role in companies that
have been able to increase their service productivity.
C. In both the service sector and manufacturing, productivity improvements are
concentrated in gains in quality.
D. The service sector typically requires larger investments in new technology in
order to maintain productivity growth than dose manufacturing.
E. High interest rates tend to slow the growth of manufacturing productivity as much
as they slow the growth of service-sector productivity in the United States.
Answer:E

請問本題的解題思路,因為第三段我看不是很懂作者主要的闡述!

藍字是作者反駁another explanation blames the federal budget deficit
頭像
hcgh
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 79
註冊時間: 2006-05-01 09:37


回到 GMAT Reading Comprehension 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客