Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - 真題一道

真題一道

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

真題一道

文章汪汪北鼻 » 2005-06-07 05:01

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change.
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
D.by pointing to the absence of negative effects simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.

我選D,請教各位意見 :smile
頭像
汪汪北鼻
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 392
註冊時間: 2004-10-30 00:52
來自: Taipei

文章evelight » 2005-06-07 06:27

M的觀點: 法官的薪水總是太低。即使薪水提高了,只要禁止法官賺外快,就無法吸引好人才
暗示薪水還是太低(雖然已經調高了),在現行薪資水準下,外快是關鍵。

P的觀點: 因為適用禁令的人少,禁令對吸引人才沒有負面影響,薪水的調升的確對現狀是有改善的。

這題BD決選
B: 因果顛倒
D: 指出禁令的負面影響不存在,反對M,卻沒有為自己的反對立場提出證據支持

猶豫半天,我覺得B比較好
D說P沒有evidence,只是憑空反對。但P其實是有證據的,他注意到very few judges teach or give lectures。
B比較狠,直接說雖然P觀察到某個現象,但是這個現象不是原因而是結果,他根本搞錯啦~

繼續討論喔....
頭像
evelight
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 421
註冊時間: 2005-01-01 04:16

文章訪客 » 2005-06-07 06:34

Mei emphasizes on the negataive effect-a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat want to ingore this negative effeect so he said Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.


As option D said, Pat really ignore this negative effect withour providing any evidence for that.

discuss more...
訪客
 

文章freshmanduke » 2005-06-08 22:36

I support D.
這裡並無明顯指出cause-and-effect關係
B應該不對
頭像
freshmanduke
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 245
註冊時間: 2005-02-24 21:46
來自: 台南人

文章nicoleliu » 2005-06-08 22:39

我也認為是D
不覺得這題有因果關係存在~
請再討論 :smile
Class of 2008, MBA @ Babson College
Co-President of Marketing & PR
Asia Business Club
頭像
nicoleliu
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 274
註冊時間: 2004-11-01 09:16
來自: Boston

Re: 真題一道

文章sandarac » 2005-06-09 12:36

汪汪北鼻 \$m[1]:Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change.
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
D.by pointing to the absence of negative effects simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.

我選D,請教各位意見 :smile


看到的直覺就選D了...
Sandarac Lee, MBA, Class of 2008
_____________________________________________________
Account Manager, Chemex Industrial Co., Ltd.
大城小事/Formosa同學會-Schulich School of Business 版主
"沒有人能決定雁的去留,只有雲可以..."
頭像
sandarac
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 539
註冊時間: 2004-11-05 00:23
來自: 台南

文章kikhorse » 2006-09-24 20:40

我覺得是 C 吧,
前面說: Pat "attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect" ==> 不就呼應了文章中的 "... the raise in salaray really DOES IMPROVE the situation."
選項C後面說的 "merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects"==> 不就呼應了文章中的 "... the ban will have LITTLE OR NO NEGATIVE EFFECT".

我怎嚜看都是c很好, D應該算有給出evidence吧~~ 不然Pat怎麼會說 "since very few judges teach or give lectures", 牠一定是從某處得知的阿 這就是evidence阿...

不知道大家答案是什麼? open to discuss...

btw, 這題GWD 25#3答案給A耶 昏倒
kikhorse
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 83
註冊時間: 2006-06-27 10:50

文章joyce0519 » 2006-10-14 12:46

我怎嚜看都是c很好, D應該算有給出evidence吧~~ 不然Pat怎麼會說 "since very few judges teach or give lectures", 牠一定是從某處得知的阿 這就是evidence阿...

不知道大家答案是什麼? open to discuss...

btw, 這題GWD 25#3答案給A耶 昏倒[/quote]
.....可是我選A耶,
Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

MEL認為只因為現在很少人會授課,所以未來不會有影響
好像和A選項很合耶??
ㄧ點淺見
joyce0519
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 135
註冊時間: 2006-01-16 15:18


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 8 位訪客