[問題]Fei Fei #107

[shena]

Because of the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

Ans:(E)

題目是說這家公司在接下來兩年內生產必須提昇否則就會破產.該公司的生產結構是若10%的生產力增幅是可能 的話那麼20%的增幅也是可達到的(如有誤解題意請大大指正)
我的疑問是...選項(B)哪裡有錯誤呢?

[Pudding]

我也是選B...

幫頂一下, 請各位大大協助~!

[魚]

Because of the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

Ans:(E)

題目是說這家公司在接下來兩年內生產利必須提昇否則就會破產.該公司的生產結構是若10%的生產力增幅是可能 的話那麼20%的增幅也是可達到的(如有誤解題意請大大指正)
我的疑問是...選項(B)哪裡有錯誤呢?

路過亂踹一下

本題邏輯重心不在數字...請勿被騙

(B) Quore [highlight=yellow]will not go bankrupt [/highlight]if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years

太武斷.....

題目的假設是 能生出10% 就有可能生出20%
沒說明多少才不會破產 , right

E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt

選項設計是拿來對應 (B) 的 , 沒有產能一定完蛋 ( <==簡譯)

[維尼]

為什麼我覺得沒一個答案是對的
B E 的那個 20% 原文當中都沒提到

要怎麼推出來呢?
請大家指教一下

[Jessy]

照魚大王的說法, 我反而認為E更武斷說....
未達到增加20%產能-->一定破產

我對題目的解讀: 增加產能 --> 不會破產
對B的解讀: 產能增加20% --> 不會破產

Because of the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt.

(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.

(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

[魚]

照魚大王的說法, 我反而認為E更武斷說....
未達到增加20%產能-->一定破產

我對題目的解讀: 增加產能 --> 不會破產
對B的解讀: 產能增加20% --> 不會破產

Because of the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt.

(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.

(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

若A則B....非B則非A......我有記錯嗎 (大驚....驚 驚 驚...羞)

題目 : 增加產能 (A)--> (B)不會破產 (from Jessy)

得 :非B(破產)--> 非A (沒增加產能)
..........................................................................(+在解脫了....)

[Pudding]

若A則B....非B則非A......我有記錯嗎 (大驚....驚 驚 驚...羞)

題目 : 增加產能 (A)--> (B)不會破產 (from Jessy)

得 :非B(破產)--> 非A (沒增加產能)

魚大爺這麼說是沒錯... 可是妳前面的解釋似乎是:
若A則B, 非A則非B.... 這樣似乎就反了...

E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt

選項設計是拿來對應 (B) 的 , 沒有產能一定完蛋 ( <==簡譯)

我認為E所以不對, 是覺得原題並未提到需要增加多少產能才不會破產, 那麼我可以認為只要有增加就一定不會破產... 如此, 選項E只能推出Quore未達到10%的增加 (因為沒有達到20%就表示沒達到10%), 並不表示一點都沒有增加...

有點confusing了... 請各位大大繼續指教....

[魚]

我完全不行了 dora10 .... (也不知道自己在說蛇麼了 nosee )

拜託大大們嚕

[nicoleliu]

我上CD看~~發現它們說這題題目有問題......dora11

正確題目如下: [轉自CD]
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.

附帶一個NN的解釋~~
我觉得这道题在考察原命题和逆否命题的关系。原文中的条件是 not go bankrupt-->10% increase-->20% increase, 所以，可以推出 not 20%--->go bankrup, E is correct
B 恰恰将必要和充分条件 混淆。故错！

我想降應該就滿清楚的了~~

[Calvin]

我怎麼覺得沒有答案…

理由是：題目沒給破產跟產能的關係，就像布丁說的題目未提到需要增加多少產能才不會破產，這樣一來， B也不能說就一定對 ， 因為搞不好需要增加到25%才不會破產

總之，我也昏了…

呼叫強者~~~

[Calvin]

拍謝！我上面那篇回覆是在沒看到nicoleliu同學發的帖下所打的

看了nicoleliu的說明，支持E

[Pudding]

Yup... the added red words solve the problem...

I go for E then...

謝謝nicoleliu同學的分享哦~!

[訪客]

Yup... the added red words solve the problem...

I go for E then...

謝謝nicoleliu同學的分享哦~!

Absolutely agree

[ustoday]

可以理解E
但考試時 卻可能選B 頭昏昏
考試可別出這麼機車的題