Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - LSAT,test 10,7

LSAT,test 10,7

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

LSAT,test 10,7

文章freshmanduke » 2005-06-17 15:20

7. Waste management companies, which collect waste for disposal in landfills and incineration plants, report that disposable plastics make up an ever-increasing percentage of the waste they handle. It is clear that attempts to decrease the amount of plastic that people throw away in the garbage are failing.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Because plastics create harmful pollutants when burned, an increasing percentage of the plastics handled by waste management companies are being disposed of in landfills.
(B) Although many plastics are recyclable, most of the plastics disposed of by waste management companies are not.
(C) People are more likely to save and reuse plastic containers than containers made of heavier materials like glass or metal.
(D) An increasing proportion of the paper, glass, and metal cans that waste management companies used to handle is now being recycled.
(E) While the percentage of products using plastic packaging is increasing, the total amount of plastic being manufactured has remained unchanged.
the answer is D 但我選B
想請問為什麼B不行
謝謝
頭像
freshmanduke
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 245
註冊時間: 2005-02-24 21:46
來自: 台南人

文章micht » 2005-06-17 22:08

7. Waste management companies, which collect waste for disposal in landfills and incineration plants, report that disposable plastics make up an ever-increasing percentage of the waste they handle. It is clear that attempts to decrease the amount of plastic that people throw away in the garbage are failing.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (那麼答案就是要選 the opposite)

我想這題CR主要要針對上面紅字的重點
an ever-increasing percentage of the waste

(B) Although many plastics are recyclable, most of the plastics disposed of by waste management companies are not.

部分plastics可以recylcle
但是大部分的plastic disposed by waste management companies are not recyclable.
而proportion plastic waste仍是上升的狀態
=>丟plastic waste的人越來越多 不然都已經有再做回收了怎麼還會上升?
回收量<丟棄量=>fail to contral the amount of plastic that people throw away=>strengthen the statement

(D) An increasing proportion of the paper, glass, and metal cans that waste management companies used to handle is now being recycled.

因為其他除plastic以外的paper,glass...,etc 有資源回收
造成 plastic waste proportion看起來成長許多
實際上不是更多人製造plastic waste的原因=>weakens the statement
圖檔圖檔圖檔
頭像
micht
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3276
註冊時間: 2004-09-27 12:13

文章freshmanduke » 2005-06-17 23:09

我想請問一下B Although many plastics are recyclablemost of the plastics disposed of by waste management companies are not.

應該是指可回收的waste不可回收的waste如此一來 不就說waste management companies 處裡的部分是因為不可回收而不是人們蓄意增加waste
這樣一來不就weaken conclusion that attempts to decrease the amount of plastic that people throw away in the garbage are failing
頭像
freshmanduke
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 245
註冊時間: 2005-02-24 21:46
來自: 台南人

文章micht » 2005-06-17 23:57

請問freshmanduke如果選B的話
如何理解report that disposable plastics make up an ever-increasing percentage of the waste they handle的現象
圖檔圖檔圖檔
頭像
micht
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3276
註冊時間: 2004-09-27 12:13

文章freshmanduke » 2005-06-18 23:41

I've got it, thanks for your help.
頭像
freshmanduke
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 245
註冊時間: 2005-02-24 21:46
來自: 台南人

文章reohuang » 2005-06-18 23:58

題目說到這個company所處理垃圾裡面的plastic比例增加,因此推論是:減少plastic總量的這個attempt失敗所導致(換句話也就是推論說:總量並沒有減少,至少持平或增加),問weaken

d)比例的增加是因為其他的垃圾被recycle,是其他的量減少導致plastic比例增加,所以可能同時plastic 的總量減少了...但是其所佔比例仍然增加,因此可以weaken題目的推論方式

b)大部分company處理到的都是不可以recyclable的,這個並不影響談論的這個"比例"值(因為題目探討的就是這個company處理的比例),所以不影響這個推論

個人意見~
頭像
reohuang
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 305
註冊時間: 2004-11-23 01:44


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 4 位訪客