天山8-13

由 **chunjuwu** » 2005-01-18 20:27

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

B. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was

C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

D. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was

E. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

答案是A，請指教

由 **Behemoth** » 2005-01-18 21:01

動詞用is,所以de錯
表目的多用to v ,they沒東西代, b錯
c的be錯,沒理由用原形
另外bd中的was也錯,不符假設法

選a

網站 · 由 **agk99** » 2005-01-18 21:05

是不是哪裡看過呀
知道鏈結的朋友麻煩補一下

由 **yotoan** » 2005-07-07 20:31

各位大大..小的是選B
想請教前輩思路~
我的疑點是..
1.(A)是subjunctive mood嗎??
if子句用were..但我在主要子句找不到過去式助V說..
2.(B)為何不好??
感恩先!!

ps.謝謝B大指點...我每次都跟不到原帖~~>0<~~

由 **yotoan** » 2005-07-08 13:44

沒人理偶..自己頂一下..
麻煩大大了..

由 **liwuu** » 2005-07-08 14:34

我選C...
選項B,D皆明顯不符合假設用法...if the deal were
然後主要字句可能為a merger agreement (should) be signed by them with a provision for penalties...其中可省略掉should,意義不變!!

由維尼 » 2005-07-08 14:49

yotoan \$m[1]:各位大大..小的是選B
想請教前輩思路~
我的疑點是..
1.(A)是subjunctive mood嗎??
if子句用were..但我在主要子句找不到過去式助V說..
2.(B)為何不好??
感恩先!!

ps.謝謝B大指點...我每次都跟不到原帖~~>0<~~

如果選B是直說法
選A是假設法
你覺得句意是哪一個呢?

另外
假設法的使用
我個人是傾向老師的說法: 是句意決定是否要使用假設法
這題是用 provision for penalties
所以沒有動詞讓你判斷
但是句意是不是該用假設法呢? :smile

由 **yotoan** » 2005-07-09 09:34

謝謝liwuu大人理偶..
但我想請教一下...
C選項裡的with a provision for penalties
是拿來修飾signed 還是agreement??
小的讀了千百遍還是結得霧煞煞~

維尼大人謝謝啦!!
居然搞了個名詞出來~~太難了啦!!
我如果用is expected to判定可以嗎??
另小的記得莫北北說的..
"有if子句不代表一定是假設法..沒有if子句也不代表一定不是假設法"
但小的的疑點在..
1.既然他已經用if S were...,理論上主要子句應該要加過去式助動詞.
2.不然就是不要用if來表達...在主要子句上用would說明就好..
3.假設法可以單獨用if S were就可以了嗎??

由 **yotoan** » 2005-07-10 22:27

~~>0<~~救郎哦...沒人理偶..自己來頂一下

由維尼 » 2005-07-12 02:07

yotoan \$m[1]:謝謝liwuu大人理偶..
但我想請教一下...
C選項裡的with a provision for penalties
是拿來修飾signed 還是agreement??
小的讀了千百遍還是結得霧煞煞~

維尼大人謝謝啦!!
居然搞了個名詞出來~~太難了啦!!
我如果用is expected to判定可以嗎??
另小的記得莫北北說的..
"有if子句不代表一定是假設法..沒有if子句也不代表一定不是假設法"
但小的的疑點在..
1.既然他已經用if S were...,理論上主要子句應該要加過去式助動詞.
2.不然就是不要用if來表達...在主要子句上用would說明就好..
3.假設法可以單獨用if S were就可以了嗎??

ㄛ
這樣說吧
對我來說
這題的 is expected to 是用來消去 if the deal was 這個答案:時態不合
要是現在式或未來式
所以就只剩 the deal were 這個表"未來"事實相反的答案
倒不是先決定是與未來事實相反
才決定選 if the deal were 的答案

由維尼 » 2005-07-12 02:09

Behemoth \$m[1]:if S were 這是與現在相反假設法,主要子句要未來式,不是過去式喔
(我記錯請糾正我喔...太久沒唸書了...:p)

至於為何不用未來式,我想或許是因為expected已帶有未來的味道了....

大家討論~

were to V 應該是未來事實相反
主要子句要用過去式助動詞 + V

由 **yotoan** » 2005-07-12 23:52

謝謝維大..我了解思路了!!

與現在相反:If were/V過, S would VR
與過去相反:If had Vpp, S would have Vpp
與未來相反:If were to VR, S would VR

可能性爆小:If should VR, S would VR
可能性爆大:If V簡單式, S will VR

由 **Behemoth** » 2005-07-12 23:56

哈哈
感謝維尼兄大力糾正啦 ~~~
^^

yotoan不要被我誤導了喔~

由 **yotoan** » 2005-07-13 15:46

B大別這麼說..
之前也有麻煩泥幫偶解了很多思路吶..
感謝都來不及囉!!

由 **jim9619** » 2005-09-14 20:05

請問A選項that includes...要修飾什麼??
不懂
請指點感謝

天山8-13

天山8-13

誰在線上