[問題]GWD7-Q10~Q12

[cocaine]

維尼你句子看錯了..在K之前,大多專家都沒注意到女性的教育,只有W再當時有去注意.

[維尼]

維尼你句子看錯了..在K之前,大多專家都沒注意到女性的教育,只有W再當時有去注意.

Dear cocaine,

我的notes如下 <->表contrast
K <-> T : before and after Revolution
T <-> other educational historians before K : mention education opportunities for girls

不過我大略瞭解為啥B比較好了
因為 within the field of educational history
加上文章中有提到
Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,

所以應該是用第一個方向答題
感謝指教 :))

[邁向高等學府]

10
According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was

A.innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence
B.exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
C.unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices
D.controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys
E.atypical in that it examined the education of girls
這題我認為是E耶

Q10 to Q12:
　　　 Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
　 1980’s that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideology of “republican
Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
　　　　　United States. Kerber maintained that
　　　　　the leaders of the new nation wanted
　　　　　women to be educated in order to raise
　　　　　politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citi-
(10) zenry was considered essential to the
　　　　　success of the country’s republican form
　　　　　of government; virtue was to be instilled
　　　　　not only by churches and schools, but
　　　　　by families, where the mother’s role
(15) was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber,
　　　　　motherhood became pivotal to the fate
　　　　　of the republic, providing justification for
　　　　　an unprecedented attention to female
　　　　　education.
(20) Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography. Prior to Kerber’s work,
　　　　　educational historians barely mentioned
　　　　　women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work is the notable exception. Examining
　　　　　newspaper advertisements for acade-
　　　　　mies, Woody found that educational
　　　　　opportunities increased for both girls
　　　　　and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An
(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
　　　　　a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
　　　　　practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
　　　　　Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
　　　　　regarding female education, although it
　　　　　may have accelerated earlier trends.
　　　　　Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,
　　　　　making it difficult to determine to what
　　　　　extent the Revolution really changed
　　　　　women’s lives.

[邁向高等學府]

Q12:
The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?

A.The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century
B.The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution
C.The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution
D.Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century

本題我認為是D
文中第34-最後一行，
Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.
Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
obscured the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what
extent the Revolution really changed
women’s lives.

強調W的證據反駁了革命對於女性教育態度的影響。W的論點是，大眾對女性教育的支持態度在革命之前就已存在，而非因為革命後而產生，革命也許只加速並強化了在革命前就已存在的社會對女性教育態度的支持。而K的論點是，社會對女性教育支持態度是在革命發生後…
由於W和K所討論的事件背景在18世紀…
因此我認為D

[維尼]

10
According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was

A.innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence
B.exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
C.unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices
D.controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys
E.atypical in that it examined the education of girls
這題我認為是E耶

Q10 to Q12:
　　　 Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
　 1980’s that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideology of “republican
Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
　　　　　United States. Kerber maintained that
　　　　　the leaders of the new nation wanted
　　　　　women to be educated in order to raise
　　　　　politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citi-
(10) zenry was considered essential to the
　　　　　success of the country’s republican form
　　　　　of government; virtue was to be instilled
　　　　　not only by churches and schools, but
　　　　　by families, where the mother’s role
(15) was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber,
　　　　　motherhood became pivotal to the fate
　　　　　of the republic, providing justification for
　　　　　an unprecedented attention to female
　　　　　education.
(20) Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography. Prior to Kerber’s work,
　　　　　educational historians barely mentioned
　　　　　women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work is the notable exception. Examining
　　　　　newspaper advertisements for acade-
　　　　　mies, Woody found that educational
　　　　　opportunities increased for both girls
　　　　　and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An
(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
　　　　　a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
　　　　　practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
　　　　　Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
　　　　　regarding female education, although it
　　　　　may have accelerated earlier trends.
　　　　　Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,
　　　　　making it difficult to determine to what
　　　　　extent the Revolution really changed
　　　　　women’s lives.

我本來也選E
可是題目有提到 within the field of educational history
也就是要以整個教育歷史來看
加上 Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends
所以可以推論出應該是要答案B
而答案E只是 Thomas 跟 他當時的歷史學家 的contrast
並不是整個歷史

[林小馬]

12題選b 理由同金剛跟我之前講過的
10題重點在prior to,所以選b,e錯在woody不是因為研究girl而特殊,是因為時間

我第10題選E耶
我說一下我的想法喔 可以幫我矯正一下嗎

Q10: (答案是B)
According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was
B. exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
E. atypical in that it examined the education of girls

如果它是問Thomas Woody和Linda Kerber不同在哪裡
那我會選B

可是他現在好像是問
在所有關於教育歷史的研究中 Thomas Woody的作品特別在哪裡
那我就會選E

出自於以下段落
他這樣好像是說在Kerber之前
Thomas Woody是唯一一個跟別人不同 會探討女性教育的

Prior to Kerber’s work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929
work is the notable exception. Examining
newspaper advertisements for acade-
mies, Woody found that educational
opportunities increased for both girls
and boys around 1750.

請指教一下喔
謝謝謝謝
我常常用一種想法 就一直轉不過來
幫我看一下哪裡有問題囉 感謝

[CUGGYER]

Q10我也覺得是E 當TW做這項研究時 他的重點並非在反駁LK 而是在討論當時女性已經有受教育的機會 把TW跟LK拿來比較是因為後來的歷史學家在討論美國革命對女性教育機會的影響才提到
如果Q10 B有點OUT OF SCOPE的感覺

Q12
我到看完文章後 覺得兩者比較重點在於TW/LK對於女性教育機會上升時間點意見不同選B 因此D選項說對女性教育機會觀點改變是否在18世紀 跟文章重點不同
並且兩皆有改變 也都是在18世紀 一個美國革命之前 一個之後

我好想用英文表達唷 剛剛試了一下 自己的意見竟然不知道怎麼表達

[davidlee0222]

practice makes perfect

[ustoday]

我覺得答案是D耶
Woody also claimed that

practical education for females had

many advocates before the Revolution.

Woody’s evidence challenges the notion

(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes

regarding female education, although it

may have accelerated earlier trends.

Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-

lican motherhood” thesis may have

(40) obscured the presence of these trends,

making it difficult to determine to what

extent the Revolution really changed

women’s lives.

--------
先看加粗的地方 ----W認為 女性教育 在revlution 之前就有提倡了
紅色的地方代表----W的出現證明女性教育不是因為revlution 產生
畫線的地方----revlution 可能加速了女性教育的腳步

藍色部分開始 表一般歷史學家都採K 的理論 所產生的障礙
因為K 只有討論revlution 後面的事件 對於revlution 之前發生的事都沒有討論 這樣對很難去決定revlution 對女性教育產生真正改變的範圍

所以D 兩者不同地啷在於 "是否女性教育的改變during 18th"

K's argument 目標時間在1980
revlution 時間1775-1783
W 1775 之前

[fiona]

我有個白吃的問題想請各位高手幫我解釋一下...
Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980’s
Thomas Woody’s 1929 work
所以是不是TW比LK晚
IF SO
TW不等於PRIOR LK的學者
則TW不是那些少提到女生的學者的ATYPICAL
所以第10題不能選e
哈哈快點告訴我哪裡想錯了~~

[enim]

我有個白吃的問題想請各位高手幫我解釋一下...
Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980’s
Thomas Woody’s 1929 work
所以是不是TW比LK晚
IF SO
TW不等於PRIOR LK的學者
則TW不是那些少提到女生的學者的ATYPICAL
所以第10題不能選e
哈哈快點告訴我哪裡想錯了~~

為什麼TW比LK晚呢？1929比1980早呀！
這一題 裡面的年代太多了...尤其第一句話...
一開始 我也跟你一樣有這個疑問說...
現在仔細一看...原來是看錯了呀...
第十題 我也是在B和E中間struggle...
although I chose E...
to see all these arguement above
I would like to choose B

[cynthiachan]

我正在檢討這一題(Q12)看了好久
一開始我選D，但是對18th 有疑惑
在檢討的時候我改選C
因為我以為題目問的是K跟W最大不同點在哪
1. 沒有選B的原因是K沒有討論prior to American Revolution所以也沒有 support的意味
2.K跟W都有談論到after American Revlutuon
我一開始就被這兩個答案搞混了
最後我還是覺得D比較好一點
1. W沒說改變是發生在1750，他只是"發現"在1750年並沒有說他覺得改變在1750年，所以可以選答案D
2. 對B有存疑的地方主要在他說 the extent of the support W應該沒有support吧？

Q12: The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?

A. The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century
B. The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution
C. The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution
D. Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century
E. Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government

[davidslin]

我覺得答案是D耶
Woody also claimed that

practical education for females had

many advocates before the Revolution.

Woody’s evidence challenges the notion

(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes

regarding female education, although it

may have accelerated earlier trends.

Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-

lican motherhood” thesis may have

(40) obscured the presence of these trends,

making it difficult to determine to what

extent the Revolution really changed

women’s lives.

--------
先看加粗的地方 ----W認為 女性教育 在revlution 之前就有提倡了
紅色的地方代表----W的出現證明女性教育不是因為revlution 產生
畫線的地方----revlution 可能加速了女性教育的腳步

藍色部分開始 表一般歷史學家都採K 的理論 所產生的障礙
因為K 只有討論revlution 後面的事件 對於revlution 之前發生的事都沒有討論 這樣對很難去決定revlution 對女性教育產生真正改變的範圍

所以D 兩者不同地啷在於 "是否女性教育的改變during 18th"

K's argument 目標時間在1980
revlution 時間1775-1783
W 1775 之前

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
1980’s that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideology of “republican
motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-
cational opportunities for women in the
United States.

LK已經說明了美國革命是導致女性教育的狂潮,顯然他是不支持在美國革命前的女性教育機會有增加的現象,相反的W則是支持美國革命前女性教育就有增加......

LK跟W著眼點雖然是在美國革命前後,可是都是在18世紀,(LK1775-1783,W1750)所以D顯然無法區別兩人觀點的不同

[davidslin]

[quote="cynthiachan"]我正在檢討這一題(Q12)看了好久
一開始我選D，但是對18th 有疑惑
在檢討的時候我改選C
因為我以為題目問的是K跟W最大不同點在哪
1. 沒有選B的原因是K沒有討論prior to American Revolution所以也沒有 support的意味
2.K跟W都有談論到after American Revlutuon
我一開始就被這兩個答案搞混了
最後我還是覺得D比較好一點
1. W沒說改變是發生在1750，他只是"發現"在1750年並沒有說他覺得改變在1750年，所以可以選答案D
Pointing to “An Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view

2. 對B有存疑的地方主要在他說 the extent of the support W應該沒有support吧？

[haohao]

對不起...
我還是不懂第10題
我是選E的
還是不了解前面為什麼說因為看到
Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “republican motherhood” thesis may have obscured the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women’s lives.
還有題目說whthin the field of educational history
所以就覺得B比較好
我不大懂上面這段引文的含意??